It's the lack of context that blows it, Terry. If you study it for a while you can figure out what's going on, but even what's going on isn't terribly interesting. Hate to say that, because Robert is one heck of a photographer. Unfortunately, as I'm sure you realize, we all have our lapses. Sometimes it pays to wait a fairly long time before deciding to post something. I stand by what I said in "On Street Photography": ". . .even when you get good at street photography you'll shoot bags and bags of bloopers, a smaller number of not too bad shots, and the rare picture you should be willing to show. Beyond the rare picture that's showable there's the kind of picture upon which you'd be willing to hang your reputation. If you can average one of those a year you're getting pretty good." I wrote that about street, but it applies to ANY photography.