...I would make sure I had the right equipment. The field of view looked no wider than could be captured by a wide angle lens...
As they say, "you go to war with the army you have, not the army you wish you have." In other words, practicing photographers use the equipment they already have and know well. Very, very few photographers can afford to always have with them the latest and greatest model of everything. And even if they would have a wonderful collection at home, it is a matter of trade-off (weight and volume vs. needs) when you venture out, especially to such a remote and inhospitable location as Death Valley (noticed the word "death" in its name?).
The lens and camera Alain used is considered to be one of the best super-wide angle lens and body combinations ever designed. There is no wider lens for his camera (except a fish eye), plus it is very compact. The use of a digital back with a crop factor in combination with that body and lens reduces the view angle even further. Hence stitching.
One can use a single super-wide angle lens for panoramas, but that also results in a lot of unnecessary foreground and sky, which need to be cropped in post, reducing the file size for larger prints (just look at my Chicago panorama and imagine just how much more water and sky there would be if it were taken with a single, super-wide angle lens). Besides, a file captured with a single super wide-angle lens will always suffer from less edge sharpness, chromatic aberrations, and other issues, in comparison to a stitched file. Also, if one needs to print big, stitching provides better files, more pixels and more details.