Yeah, right - but the fact remains that you aren't actually doing anything apart from typing garbage on an internet forum.
Besides, I will be voting soon... would that count as "doing"?
It was probably rhetorical but I don't think it's one or the other, analysis or action, it's probably both, and other things too, simultaneously, all the time. I presume that what you meant by action is to go shoot someone. I would agree, when someone is shooting at you, you should shoot back. In this case, ISIS seems to have no friends so nobody will be upset when people shoot back. But unless you analyze first, you might not know who to shoot.From the NY Times: NY Times opinion piece.
I agree: simultaneous and all the time.Good article, thanks.Here is another, in the Washington Post, written by a former ambassador to Iraq, Turkey and Albania, and deputy national security adviser: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-us-must-send-ground-forces-to-eliminate-the-islamic-state/2015/11/16/685aff20-8c63-11e5-ae1f-af46b7df8483_story.html
It's going to end up being whack-a-mole. Until "moderate" Islam (yes the vast proportion who follow the precepts of Islam are in fact moderates as per three of my neighbors) openly reject "radical" Islam and take overt steps to end support of the Wahabist regime in Saudi Arabia who disproportionately fund all this (along with their Qatari neighbors) things will never get resolved. Another splinter group will arise (look at the huge Islamic discontent in regions of Russia). There needs to be a unified approach to this problem, throwing more soldiers and ordinance at ISIS is a useful short term strategy but destined to end up just like Iraq and Afghanistan. The US will feel good for a moment but things will eventually go south (remember President Bush's proclamation of victory on the aircraft carrier back in 2003???).
‘With Open Gates: The forced collective suicide of European nations’, a slick, hard-hitting film about the European migrant crisis is going viral in Europe, already watched at least million and half times.http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/11/watch-anti-migrant-video-going-viral-across-europe/
The military objective of removing the Bath Party from power in Iraq was the mission that carrier helped accomplish. Neither the sailors aboard nor President Bush had any illusion that the "war was over" or that all problems in Iraq were solved. Anyone who paid any attention to what Bush said that day would know that.
the fact that things weren't going to according to the hawks wet dreams
From a pragmatic perspective, two questions, without any political stand, which I do not wish to discuss here:1. ISIS is selling oil to make money, who is buying it?2. ISIS is using said money to buy guns, who is selling them?Regards
Well this is the crazy thing - the answer to your questions are the same in both cases - everyone. The Syrian regime, the Turks, ultimately you and me. http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/fact-check-fund-reign-terror/21908
Yes, I already knew about all these topics. My intention was to draw attention to the fact that political discussion alone will not oust these barbarians; actions will, and cutting supply lines and financial ties from the likes of Saudi, Qatar, and Kuwait...
Yes, I already knew about all these topics...
...Yep, an all star cast of reliable authorities.
While we are all busy working ourselves up into a lather about those wicked Islamic fundamentalists here's another zealot that should perhaps be condemned, or is it alright because he's 'one of us'?http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/16/christian-pastor-criticizes-paris-terror-attack-victims-for-attending-death-metal-concert/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=friendlyatheist_111615UTC051113_daily&utm_content=&spMailingID=50028537&spUserID=MTQ0Mzk0MDA2MTc1S0&spJobID=802204080&spReportId=ODAyMjA0MDgwS0