I'm sorry, but from what you said, I can't figure out what you mean.
Jim
I infer that he is saying that his iphone 6 plus (which I don't believe actually exists, but may be a pun on Phase One nomenclature?) captured an almost identical ( whether in subject matter or technically is not made clear) image and therefore is the equal or indeed may be superior as an optical image capturing electronic device than all other sub classes of digital cameras. The evidence for this is apparently completely anecdotal as no image is attached or linked to to support the statement.
I believe this may be a post from a deliberately provocative message board user which does not warrant further comment.
I would hesitate to apply the description troll as that is a subjective judgement and others may regard this post as a legitimate contribution to the discussion, even if controversial.
Does that help?
(Yep, a quiet Sunday morning here and I missed the early nice light, still, looking forward to my previously cherished P45+ arriving if only to prove how dreadful it is as an image capturing device)
BTW Check the weather it was 30C in parts of Scotland last week