A distinction without a difference. The point is, the government stopped the Johnson vaccinations. Who cares if it wasn't just the CDC but rather a joint statement between the CDC and the FDA? Who cares if they "paused" it rather than "stopped it"? That's just nonsensical "cover-your-ass" verbiage from Fauci. You're obfuscating the matter with unimportant factoids. No one is getting vaccinated with it. All those people who had appointments now have to scramble to find other means to get their shots. So they're exposed to the virus for a longer period. How many of them will die compared to the one person who might die from blood clots?
I don't understand your consternation about this. The preliminary data is making the researchers nervous and they've decided to have a better look before proceeding. Would you prefer if they rolled the dice and went ahead, and it turned out that lots of people developed clots, more than what has emerged so far? It's a novel treatment, doesn't it make sense to keep a close watch? So some appointments get cancelled or postponed. It's inconvenient and frustrating for the people involved but it's not the end of the world either.
I remember you once stated that you didn't take the annual flu shot because you were convinced that it gave you the flu. Now you're complaining about being cautious about the Covid vaccine rollout.
Let me guess, "experts" flip-flopping again, right?