So, what went wrong in your case!?
Slobodan,
I don’t think you get to play that card, it belongs to my 8 years old daughter and even her is starting to outgrow it.
No need to confess in public, it’s between you and your conscience.
But I'll answer nonetheless... :-)
I follow the process I described all the time.
- I do read news from many different news sources, in different countries and in different languages
- I do change my mind when new validated facts appear that change my understanding of a topic, one recent example is the chloriquine
- This can modify my perception of things, for instance I now have some doubts about the objectivity of the Lancet, which I never had in the past
On the topic at hand, I have not found any credible information source that changed my perception that:
- Trump downplayed the pandemic: we have tens of declarations from Trump himself that are beyond any possible, this is not media reporting
- The focused on his re-election more than on the safety of Americans and the economy of the country: this is one interpretation of his deeds, but I have not seen any other credible explanation. Him being grossly incompetent is another one, but I don't thing it's credible
- This caused the deaths of tens of thousands of people and is the main reason why the economic impacts are as severe in the US: this is 99% likely as far as deaths is concerned, and credible analysis start to emerge (for example the eye opening comparisons between Denmark and Sweden) that confirm the hypothesis that confinement isn't the main cause of the economic impacts, it's the pandemic itself that is
What I would like to understand from you is how you are applying this process?
Cheers,
Bernard