Rather than tie themselves into pretzels, they seem to have bailed.
In al fairness, it's really tough call. Their fellow-travelers have spent the last several years insisting that corporations have the inherent right to say what they want, as loud as they want. To serve who they want, when they want, and to discriminate with regard to providing these services for any reason, or totally without a reason. The right for "opinion" commentators on the most widely viewed cable television network to call President Obama a muslim terrorist sympathizer, and for the right to publicly muse about the possibility that Hillary Clinton was secretly running a child porn ring from a DC pizza parlor, or, I guess, that a former representative might have murdered a random woman. And for the idea that this all fine because Adam Smith’s hand will swoop in and determine right and wrong without the need for onerous governmental regulation. But noting that Donald Trump might be lying? Well, apparently THAT unconscionable idea - that's just a step too far, huh?
About the only consistency I see here is that they are continuing the plaintive wailing about how conservatives are the
real victims, but hey, we're against protected classes around here, so, too bad I guess. If they don't like it, I guess they should go back to where they came from
