Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 107   Go Down

Author Topic: The American Constitution  (Read 222443 times)

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1640 on: August 13, 2019, 09:06:41 am »

Thanks guys worrying about my health. You make a good point. The big issue with me is my diabetes  2 which means lowering my carb intake.I love bread.     It had been  a bigger issue. But who knows? Yesterday I had a 6.1 on my A1C which is the lowerst diabetes count in 10 years. I seem to be doing well in that area. I'm allowed to eat meat just smaller portions.   I should ieat more chicken and fish,  and try to but I do prefer red meat better.  Also lost 20 pounds.  And exercising more.     Diet is the hardest thing to do for me.   It's not easy.   

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5338
    • advantica blog
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1641 on: August 13, 2019, 09:45:09 am »

Diets are not easy, and eating small portions is even more difficult. What I found and it works for me, eating a large bowl of salad before the main meal. Could be any salad, just lettuce or mixed, ideally without any oil dressing, and that really fills you, so your main meal can be then a small size. And skip dessert and cheese.

If you have to have meat, contrary to conventional wisdom, a lean sirloin steak contains less cholesterol than a fat chicken leg. Beef or pork contain generally more fat than chicken or turkey, but when it comes to antibiotics and growth hormones, they are all equally bad. Farmed salmon is not much better.




https://www.healthline.com/health/high-cholesterol/chicken-vs-beef#2
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1642 on: August 13, 2019, 10:22:29 am »

Diets are not easy, and eating small portions is even more difficult. What I found and it works for me, eating a large bowl of salad before the main meal. Could be any salad, just lettuce or mixed, ideally without any oil dressing, and that really fills you, so your main meal can be then a small size. And skip dessert and cheese.

If you have to have meat, contrary to conventional wisdom, a lean sirloin steak contains less cholesterol than a fat chicken leg. Beef or pork contain generally more fat than chicken or turkey, but when it comes to antibiotics and growth hormones, they are all equally bad. Farmed salmon is not much better.




https://www.healthline.com/health/high-cholesterol/chicken-vs-beef#2
Fortunately, sirloin is my favorite so that;s what I usually eat.  I keep it to 4 ounces unless I'm going out to eat.  My heart doctor believes you can eat any amount of meat and fat like the Atkins diet as long as you stay away from carbs.  The other issue is diabetes complicates the diet and makes everything bad. :-\   It's not fun getting old.  I feel like my old film camera.   :P  

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16748
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1643 on: August 13, 2019, 10:32:00 am »

ROTFL. How can you guys go on and on and on with this crap?
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1644 on: August 13, 2019, 10:45:50 am »

What's the secret Russ? :)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16748
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1645 on: August 13, 2019, 10:52:52 am »

That's the whole point, Alan. There IS no secret. What will be will be, and all the arguments in the world by posters on LuLa aren't gonna change that.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5338
    • advantica blog
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1646 on: August 13, 2019, 10:55:17 am »

Russ, are you talking about the constitution or constipation?
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16748
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1647 on: August 13, 2019, 11:14:18 am »

Russ, are you talking about the constitution or constipation?

More like diarrhea than constipation, Les. Actually, it's logorrhea: "Pathologically excessive (and often incoherent) talking." Wow! How could a description of what goes on in The Coffee Corner be more accurate than that?
« Last Edit: August 13, 2019, 11:36:02 am by RSL »
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5338
    • advantica blog
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1648 on: August 13, 2019, 11:19:21 am »

Moe like diarrhea than constipation, Les. Actually, it's logorrhea: "Pathologically excessive (and often incoherent) talking." Wow! How could a description of what goes on in The Coffee Corner be more accurate than that?

Right! Especially denying and denigrating scientifically confirmed facts and studies.
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16748
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1649 on: August 13, 2019, 11:37:19 am »

Absolutely! "Scientific consensus." Right?  :o
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5338
    • advantica blog
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1650 on: August 13, 2019, 11:42:56 am »

Absolutely! "Scientific consensus." Right?  :o

Russ, I don't know which items are refuting now. The chicken and beef specs above or antibiotics and hormones in the supermarket meats?
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1651 on: August 13, 2019, 12:43:07 pm »

Aiming for another heart surgery?

Is this a reference to fat? If so the fat in the meat is perfectly fine.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1652 on: August 13, 2019, 12:47:51 pm »

Thanks guys worrying about my health. You make a good point. The big issue with me is my diabetes  2 which means lowering my carb intake.I love bread.     It had been  a bigger issue. But who knows? Yesterday I had a 6.1 on my A1C which is the lowerst diabetes count in 10 years. I seem to be doing well in that area. I'm allowed to eat meat just smaller portions.   I should ieat more chicken and fish,  and try to but I do prefer red meat better.  Also lost 20 pounds.  And exercising more.     Diet is the hardest thing to do for me.   It's not easy.   

It isn't a diet but an eating plan. Weight loss is secondary to good blood sugar levels.

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1653 on: August 14, 2019, 09:50:08 am »

So the Democrats including some of the presidential candidates.intend to make the biggest blow to our government and constitution by "packing" the court with liberal justices.    Of course the compliant media in the liberal press buries this news.  And they accuse Trump of of tyrannical actions.

"Radical Dems Threaten SCOTUS: ‘Heal’ Itself or Face Restructuring"
https://www.libertyheadlines.com/radical-dems-scotus-restructuring/

James Clark

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2347
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1654 on: August 14, 2019, 10:39:23 am »

So the Democrats including some of the presidential candidates.intend to make the biggest blow to our government and constitution by "packing" the court with liberal justices.    Of course the compliant media in the liberal press buries this news.  And they accuse Trump of of tyrannical actions.

"Radical Dems Threaten SCOTUS: ‘Heal’ Itself or Face Restructuring"
https://www.libertyheadlines.com/radical-dems-scotus-restructuring/

Is it illegal for Congress to change the number of justices on the Supreme Court?
Logged

JoeKitchen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5080
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1655 on: August 14, 2019, 11:12:15 am »

Is it illegal for Congress to change the number of justices on the Supreme Court?

No, but it would need votes in the both the Senate and House.  The important thing to consider is the following:

"As with other Democratic efforts to undermine established rules of order, any attempt by the Left to pack the courts could set a dangerous precedent and eventually backfire against them."

Technically speaking, you need a 60% vote to enact this change.  However, if the majority party decided to take away the filibuster rule on this occasion, you can get it passed with a simple majority.  So, assuming that a Dem wins next term and the Senate flips with the house remaining the same, this could happen.  But it then opens the possibility of the Republicans doing the same when they are in power.  Considering the pandora's box the Dems in the Senate opened with the same rule change they enacted during Obama, and how that lead us to having two new Trump appointees on the court, I would not consider the move prudent.  I can't see it ending well in the long run and would only make the court more political. 

Do we really want to make the courts more political with this? 

The only time that I know of the court being packed was during the Civil War, and one could make a pretty compelling argument that this was to combat the objectively bad practice of slavery.  To pack the court for other less serious issues would be dubious.  FDR tried to do the same during his presidency and it backfired on him. 

Additionally, I cant see this happening anyway.  It really appears that it is only those low in the poles that are calling for this, more then likely a way to score percentage points and stay alive. 
Logged
"Photography is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent

Chris Kern

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2204
    • Chris Kern's Eponymous Website
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1656 on: August 14, 2019, 11:26:42 am »

Is it illegal for Congress to change the number of justices on the Supreme Court?

No: the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authority to determine the composition of the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts, and, with the exception of a few specific types of lawsuits where the Supreme Court has "original jurisdiction" (e.g., disputes involving two or more of the states), the scope of their jurisdiction.

The Court has had as few as six justices, but since 1869 the membership has been fixed at nine.

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4349
    • A Goldhammer Photography
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1657 on: August 14, 2019, 11:28:44 am »

No, but it would need votes in the both the Senate and House.  The important thing to consider is the following:

Do we really want to make the courts more political with this? 

The only time that I know of the court being packed was during the Civil War, and one could make a pretty compelling argument that this was to combat the objectively bad practice of slavery.  To pack the court for other less serious issues would be dubious.  FDR tried to do the same during his presidency and it backfired on him. 

Additionally, I cant see this happening anyway.  It really appears that it is only those low in the poles that are calling for this, more then likely a way to score percentage points and stay alive.
A better approach is to remove lifetime tenure for Supreme and other Federal Court judges.  What entitles one branch of government to have lifetime tenure?  One can debate what the appropriate length of time a judge can serve but lifetime should not be it.
Logged

degrub

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2547
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1658 on: August 14, 2019, 11:39:35 am »

lifetime tenure ensures slow change over time.
part of the design of the three branches of government.
President - every 4 years possible
Senate - every 6 years, 33% possible every 2 years
House - every 2 years.
Logged

amolitor

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 607
Re: The American Constitution
« Reply #1659 on: August 14, 2019, 11:43:13 am »

The Supreme Court has lifetime tenure for excellent reasons, and the system works very well.

At present, we're seeing a full-court decades long press from the right to pack it with compliant justices, and the effort has been spotty because of the lifetime tenure. The radical right wing firebrands simply slow down and become thoughtful, because they have nothing to prove, there is nowhere to go, they have arrived.

I assume precisely the opposite process applies when the left gets into the court-packing game, but since they've been thwarted with moderate success in recent years it's not at the top of my mind.

Roberts, in particular, has been a grave disappointment to the right. They keep hoping for Scalia, but they're not doing much finding.

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 107   Go Up