Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => The Coffee Corner => Topic started by: Kevin Gallagher on May 07, 2019, 08:26:22 am

Title: Email From B&H
Post by: Kevin Gallagher on May 07, 2019, 08:26:22 am
  Just wondering how many of us might have gotten one of these? "Interesting" doesn't begin to describe the possibilities!

(https://pbase.com/keving/image/169157819.jpg)
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 07, 2019, 09:08:54 am
Thanks, Kevin. Haven't received that one yet, though I bought a lens for my Pen-F from B&H last week. The idea that a New York outfit should collect Florida sales tax is so absurd it could only come from left-wingers. Maybe the inevitably coming capture of House, Senate and Presidency by Republicans now that the Democrats mental crackup is complete and obvious to everyone literate enough to read, will lead to a law clear enough to let the courts know how absurd the sales tax situation is. But I'm happy that I already have enough photo gear to see me out.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Rob C on May 07, 2019, 10:11:02 am
Sadly, whilst making life easier for the giants, it does nothing for all the little local camera shops that used to give sterling service and knowledgeable advice on the things they sold. I really dislike the eat your competitors mentality; there used to be room for everyone until the bean counters took an interest in the moving of units.

Rather than any real political plus for any party, I think what it reveals is the madness of not having country-wide common laws and tax regulations. Is America a country or is it not? The states system would make it appear a bit like a more dysfunctional version of Europe... but with guns and more lethal animals and reptiles. In other words, exactly the awkward place where Britain will be headed if Brexit happens, but without the beasties: we're killing off even the safe and indispensable ones - by the species - as it is.

:-)
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Chris Kern on May 07, 2019, 12:01:30 pm
The idea that a New York outfit should collect Florida sales tax is so absurd it could only come from left-wingers.

Hardly.  This "left-wing idea" was the result of a 2018 Supreme Court ruling (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-494_j4el.pdf) regarding the continuing validity of earlier Supreme Court decisions regarding the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution in an era of Internet commerce.  The five Supreme Court justices forming the majority were Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, Ginzburg, and Gorsuch.  (Roberts, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissented.)  The disagreement among the members of the Court was clearly based on jurisprudential rather than ideological grounds.

Rather than any real political plus for any party, I think what it reveals is the madness of not having country-wide common laws and tax regulations.

The Court's decision in this case wasn't a "political plus" for any party.  To the extent that the ruling created winners and losers, the winners are local retailers which always have been required to collect state sales tax from their walk-in customers; the losers are national retailers with large online sales volumes which previously were not collecting sales tax on purchases except for states in which they had a "physical presence" (e.g., a physical store within the state.)

The Supreme Court ruling is the latest refinement in a long line of judicial decisions regarding the extent to which a constitutional provision giving Congress (i.e., the federal government) the authority "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states" allows state governments to impose taxes that arguably could be considered an impediment to the free flow of commerce between states.

The United States is a common law jurisdiction, and this incremental approach to interpreting statutes passed by Congress, and especially the more general provisions in our written constitution, is a fundamental element of the country's legal DNA.  One fundamental issue in the particular litigation which led to this ruling—probably the decisive one—was the extent to which prior rulings should control the outcome of a particular case, a doctrine known as stare decisis (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/stare_decisis).
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on May 07, 2019, 01:08:13 pm
Chris, Chris, what are you doing!? Injecting facts into this lovely debate? Tsk, tsk! ;)

Not paying tax has created an unfair advantage for online retailers. While it might have made some sense in the beginning of online activities, to spur the growth, it hardly makes sense now, when it is both uber-rich and quite dominant (e.g. Amazon).
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Chris Kern on May 07, 2019, 01:31:48 pm
Not paying tax has created an unfair advantage for online retailers. While it might have made some sense in the beginning of online activities, to spur the growth, it hardly makes sense now

Indeed, as the Court acknowledged, the earlier doctrine (i.e., that a state could not require out-of-state sellers to collect taxes on purchases by its residents because that would create an undue burden on interstate commerce) had the effect of strangling many local retailers who simply couldn't compete with the price-points and sales policies of the online giants.

However, this new credit card that B&H has cooked up will effectively restore B&H's competitive advantage—at least for purchasers who qualify for and are willing to acquire one.  Of course, local retail outlets are free to match the B&H discounts for their walk-in customers, at least in theory, but it's unlikely many of them will be able to afford to shave their margins to that extent.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Aram Hăvărneanu on May 07, 2019, 04:20:14 pm
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/credit-cards
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 07, 2019, 05:05:21 pm
Hi Chris, I’ll grant your point on the SC decision, though the fact that Kennedy was part of the majority makes it a bit less overwhelming. But I wasn’t aware that my SC conservatives were that far off track. Mea culpa. I should have checked.

I do understand your argument, augmented by Slobodan, that online competition causes pain for local retailers.

So I guess the fact that a small retailer in Nebraska who sells a unique product by mail must now know the state, county and city sales tax rates for East Overshoe in Backwater county, Oregon, collect for all three political entities, obtain and fill out tax submission forms and mail in the tax for all three: maybe $.12 for Oregon, $.04 for Backwater County, and $.08 for the City of East Overshoe. No sweat. Any small retailer has plenty of spare time and extra postage money for this kind of crap. I know, because there was a time when my wife had that kind of business. Had she had to collect sales tax for the thousands of taxing entities in the U.S. she’d have simply dumped the whole thing and gone out of business.

Prior to this decision it was up to the state, county, and city to collect from the purchaser of the item. The fact that there was no workable way to do that shouldn’t have thrown the burden onto the retailer. The law needs to be rewritten.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on May 07, 2019, 05:34:56 pm
Russ, you have a point on complications. However, it is a matter of setting up a centralized national data base of various sales tax rates by county, to which retailers would have access. It can be completely automated. Just like postage, based on zip code.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Chris Kern on May 07, 2019, 06:02:42 pm
So I guess the fact that a small retailer in Nebraska who sells a unique product by mail must now know the state, county and city sales tax rates for East Overshoe in Backwater county, Oregon, collect for all three political entities, obtain and fill out tax submission forms and mail in the tax for all three: maybe $.12 for Oregon, $.04 for Backwater County, and $.08 for the City of East Overshoe. No sweat. Any small retailer has plenty of spare time and extra postage money for this kind of crap. I know, because there was a time when my wife had that kind of business. Had she had to collect sales tax for the thousands of taxing entities in the U.S. she’d have simply dumped the whole thing and gone out of business.

The Supreme Court's opinion acknowledged this concern.  It noted that reasonably-priced software to make interstate tax collection relatively effortless is likely to soon become available.  It also pointed out that the statute which was the subject of the Court's ruling, a South Dakota law requiring Internet businesses to collect sales tax on the state's behalf, was explicitly crafted to ameliorate its effect on small businesses:

Quote
South Dakota affords small mer­chants a reasonable degree of protection. The law at issue requires a merchant to collect the tax only if it does a considerable amount of business in the State; the law is not retroactive; and South Dakota is a party to the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement. . . . *

From what I've read the other states that have passed statutes requiring out-of-state retailers to collect sales tax from their residents also have exempted businesses unless their residents account for a substantial volume of sales.  The states have an interest in not crafting their statutes too broadly because, as the Court pointed out, businesses that are unduly burdened by a requirement to collect taxes from the residents of other states continue to have legal remedies available under earlier judicial opinions interpreting the commerce clause that have not been overruled by the South Dakota ruling.

———
*The Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (https://www.streamlinedsalestax.org/) is a compact, currently comprising more than half the states, to simplify interstate tax collection.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 07, 2019, 07:47:34 pm
Russ, you have a point on complications. However, it is a matter of setting up a centralized national data base of various sales tax rates by county, to which retailers would have access. It can be completely automated. Just like postage, based on zip code.

Just what we need, Slobodan: another government agency to mess with your life. I see this crap coming and it makes me damn glad I'm 89.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 07, 2019, 08:00:59 pm
The Supreme Court's opinion acknowledged this concern.  It noted that reasonably-priced software to make interstate tax collection relatively effortless is likely to soon become available.  It also pointed out that the statute which was the subject of the Court's ruling, a South Dakota law requiring Internet businesses to collect sales tax on the state's behalf, was explicitly crafted to ameliorate its effect on small businesses:

From what I've read the other states that have passed statutes requiring out-of-state retailers to collect sales tax from their residents also have exempted businesses unless their residents account for a substantial volume of sales.  The states have an interest in not crafting their statutes too broadly because, as the Court pointed out, businesses that are unduly burdened by a requirement to collect taxes from the residents of other states continue to have legal remedies available under earlier judicial opinions interpreting the commerce clause that have not been overruled by the South Dakota ruling.

That’s great, Chris. And who’s to determine what constitutes “a considerable amount of business in the State?” Oh. Yeah. A state bureaucracy no doubt. Well, that’s reassuring. And if I’m a small business “unduly burdened” by a requirement to collect taxes from the residents of other states and I continue to have legal remedies available under earlier judicial opinions, of course I’ll just hire a team of lawyers to discover what those “remedies” are, and then pursue them. That’ll all come for a pittance of course. And evidently the Supremes have gotten into the software development business since they’re sure that “reasonably-priced software to make interstate tax collection relatively effortless is likely to soon become available.”
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: DP on May 07, 2019, 10:05:36 pm
I probably missed something - do we have political discussions allowed again ? because I just read the words "left-wingers" here...
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Chris Kern on May 07, 2019, 10:25:04 pm
I probably missed something - do we have political discussions allowed again ?

Yes.  The floodgates were reopened about a month ago (https://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=129797.msg1102574#msg1102574).
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on May 08, 2019, 03:38:25 am
Yes.  The floodgates were reopened about a month ago (https://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=129797.msg1102574#msg1102574).

True; although the flow has been more of a trickle than a flood.

Jeremy
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Rob C on May 08, 2019, 04:21:13 am
The thing is, this is a problem that goes beyond the Internet.

Fair trading has been absent for a considerable time now. The remedy lies not primarily in law, but in common sense and the manufacturers seeing the wood for the trees.

My local camera dealer in Scotland used to carry Leica, Nkon and Hasselblad. Though I never bought Leica I bought and kept each of the other two systems during those years there.

One day, I walked over to his shop to buy something for my 'blad system and he turned me down. Asked what was up, he said he had been "let go" becaused he could not provide the sales numbers that the big guys in Leeds and London could. He went on to explain that 'blad was asking for more money per camera from him than the folks in London were selling the cameras for at the time. That any maker thinks it right to charge one price to a big retail company and yet a higher one to a small, beggars belief. It is mad on at least two counts: the unit is making the maker less money when sold to the big dealership; if you wanted a 'blad nothing was gonna make you buy a Bronica (probably playing the same game, anyway), so 'blad was going to make a sale to you regardless. Thus, Mr Maker was making less, overall, per unit than if he sold to all his retailers in the same country at the same price because in the end, the same number of units was going to ship.

Yes, that is commercial blindness and leads to fewer and fewer shops remaining in business and providing that first-hand experience that can make you pull out your cheque book or card right on the spot

I wrote at the start that the remedy perhaps lay not in law but in common sense. On reconsideration, perhaps it should lie in law and makers be prevented from supplying at different, discriminatory prices, to different clients. For a start, it would help keep the high streets from becoming graffiti studios, and keep more local business alive. If anyone thinks paying twenty bucks more on a few hundred bucks worth of equipment is too much, maybe they shouldn't be buying at all. And that's the kind of margin I was talking about. When I was buying 'blad it would have made no difference to me whatsoever.

Free markets sound great in theory but they do not always work that way. The giants always manage to destroy the small people, and even the small people that have success often find they have to sell themselves to giants to stay in business against bigger competitors. The fashion business is full of examples of that, where great ideas become swallowed up by huge corporations. More control, in fewer and fewer hands, is ultimately not good for anyone but the controllers.

Just this mornng I was listening on Sky News to a Glasgow taxi driver who had been with Uber for a year. He ended up, after that year, at around £ 4 per hour with a Mercedes to pay for... Uber is going public today for how many billions? This should prompt anyone with the capacity for thought to think! Is it the future we want? And make no mistake, it affects every single one of us,
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: 32BT on May 08, 2019, 06:39:31 am
Free markets sound great in theory but they do not always work that way.

Rob, first of all, remember that there is no such thing as a free market. Every market is deliberately or inadvertently manipulated in some way, shape, or form. The problem usually being subsidies, tax-reduction, prohibition, or other government intervention. That said: the problem as described in your post seems to indicate you project a Pro mindset on a consumer problem. The "free market" is driven by the "average consumer" and very apparently the average consumer prioritises price and delivery convenience over quality and service. Hence, big internutz retailers offering low prices, with low payment barriers, and quick delivery will prevail.

Latest reports in NL are that current consumer behaviour is to order several versions and sizes of one particular item with already the intent of returning the unwanted variants or items to the retailer, courtesy of the free delivery and return policy. You can imagine that returned items require significant processing before resale.

While delivery and return are currently "free" or "gratuitous" above a certain pricelimit, clearly the above purchasing method is unsustainable. However, because of competition, we will see more funds poured into offering these unprofitable services to win the race, which means: less funding into decent marketing, and price erosion in delivery. Imagine a country full of 18year old kids with a fresh driver's license and barely reasonable drivingskillz attempting to deliver dozens of packages in too little time using a large delivery van in urban areas and congested cities, with kids playing on the street and all...

Perhaps just as well the small shops all close down. You won't have a reason to leave the relative safety of home and risk going downtown.

;-(
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Rob C on May 08, 2019, 07:01:00 am
Hi Oscar.

I don't think that convenience is real: whenever I have had to buy from London I have specified mail delivery, which costs me more. I prefer paying a bit more because using the private delivery systems makes me hang on waiting on the pleasure of some delivery van coming up to service the north end of the island. Who knows when they feel like turning up!

With mail, it goes to my PO Box and waits there until I find it a good moment to go pick it up. They even send me a text message now saying I have a package.

As for all the bother of packing stuff up to return, God, no!

Rob
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: KLaban on May 08, 2019, 08:03:39 am
In terms of camera retailers I've never been better served or had more choice than I have now.

I can choose between smaller independent specialist dealers or larger outlets providing a vast array of manufacturer's goods. They all have good knowledge of product and exemplary service. They all have bricks and mortar shops as well as efficient online outlets. They all offer competitive pricing. All the above are trading today because they offer all of these qualities.

It's all too easy to crave a return to that oft remembered golden era in the mists of time, but I'll stick with the now and the reality.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: jeremyrh on May 08, 2019, 08:22:35 am
True; although the flow has been more of a trickle than a flood.

Jeremy

That's what happens as you get older.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: amolitor on May 08, 2019, 09:20:43 am
"We have more or less come to believe that our culture is a support system for commerce, whereas it should be the other way round."
    -- Robert Roaldi
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: amolitor on May 08, 2019, 09:24:47 am
Unfettered free markets, if they existed, would be complete dumpster fires.

While it is true that a more or less "free" market is the only known solution to running an economy at any scale larger than a handful of tribesmen swapping baskets for fish, with anything like reasonable efficiency, it does NOT follow logically, or in reality, that what results in some kind of blessed state of universal happiness. It follows only that, more of the time then with other systems, wood for pencils arrives at the pencil factory in more or less proper amounts at more or less the right time.

Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: jeremyrh on May 08, 2019, 10:52:18 am
Rob, first of all, remember that there is no such thing as a free market. Every market is deliberately or inadvertently manipulated in some way, shape, or form. The problem usually being subsidies, tax-reduction, prohibition, or other government intervention. T

Not really a "problem" - more a compensation for the non-optimal results of a free market. Economies are grossly non-linear systems, and without a little help will result in undesirable results - so-called "market failure"
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Arlen on May 08, 2019, 11:04:00 am
So I guess the fact that a small retailer in Nebraska who sells a unique product by mail must now know the state, county and city sales tax rates for East Overshoe in Backwater county, Oregon, collect for all three political entities, obtain and fill out tax submission forms and mail in the tax for all three: maybe $.12 for Oregon, $.04 for Backwater County, and $.08 for the City of East Overshoe.

Small point of order. "East Overshoe", Oregon, like the rest of the state, has no sales tax.
Maybe a better example would have been South Overshoe, LA? After all, Louisiana (a red state) has the highest combined state and local sales tax in the nation.  :D
Carry on.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Rob C on May 08, 2019, 11:19:37 am
In terms of camera retailers I've never been better served or had more choice than I have now.

I can choose between smaller independent specialist dealers or larger outlets providing a vast array of manufacturer's goods. They all have good knowledge of product and exemplary service. They all have bricks and mortar shops as well as efficient online outlets. They all offer competitive pricing. All the above are trading today because they offer all of these qualities.

It's all too easy to crave a return to that oft remembered golden era in the mists of time, but I'll stick with the now and the reality.

That's what's called the north/south divide, and why there is a Scottish Nationalist party. Economic shit hardy affects the greater London basin, and why everything in Britain is increasingly London-centric. You have no idea, you southies. Northwards from Watford lies a hard country(ies).

;-)
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 08, 2019, 11:32:35 am
Small point of order. "East Overshoe", Oregon, like the rest of the state, has no sales tax.
Maybe a better example would have been South Overshoe, LA? After all, Louisiana (a red state) has the highest combined state and local sales tax in the nation.  :D
Carry on.

Thanks, Arlen. But I'd rather stick with good ol' East Overshoe. It makes the points that first: the state, county and city will spend more to mail the tax forms than they'll receive in tax, and second: the merchant is going to spend more in postage to mail the tax than the amount of the tax. Beyond that, I guess the merchant's time to do all this crap is valueless, not to mention the time wasted by the public employees who'll mail out the tax forms and record the pittance returned. But what the hell, it keeps the public employees (more than likely unionized) employed, and that's usually the bottom line.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: KLaban on May 08, 2019, 11:42:03 am
That's what's called the north/south divide, and why there is a Scottish Nationalist party. Economic shit hardy affects the greater London basin, and why everything in Britain is increasingly London-centric. You have no idea, you southies. Northwards from Watford lies a hard country(ies).

;-)

And you want back there?

;-)
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on May 08, 2019, 12:45:10 pm
Thanks, Arlen. But I'd rather stick with good ol' East Overshoe. It makes the points that first: the state, county and city will spend more to mail the tax forms than they'll receive in tax, and second: the merchant is going to spend more in postage to mail the tax than the amount of the tax...

It is all online, Russ. At least when I was submitting sales tax in Illinois.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 08, 2019, 01:53:33 pm
I don’t doubt it, Slobodan, though since it’s government agencies doing this it wouldn’t be inconceivable that they’re still using pony express. But the point still is there. What it means is that the merchant is going to have to know the sales tax percent for East Overshoe, Backwater County, and Oregon in order to complete his sale. Then he’s going to have to fill out the tax forms – online in this case – and transfer the tax money to the recipients. Some states may use a joint system to collect for counties and cities, as Colorado did when I was collecting sales tax, but as of now there’s no guarantee of that.

Frankly, I’m surprised that the left isn’t complaining loudly about this. There’s no more “regressive” tax out there than sales tax.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on May 08, 2019, 02:02:50 pm
That's what happens as you get older.

As indeed it did; but I had it dealt with.

Jeremy
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on May 08, 2019, 02:35:25 pm
Russ, it is undoubtedly a hassle. Even before online sales. And even online.

Several Chicago suburbs span two counties, with different tax rates, of course. In my own suburb, I knew where the delineation is, so no problem. But for other art-fair venues, I had to search county boundaries online to determine which one applies. Then come mid-year tax-rate changes. Then art-fair organizes would advise you on one tax rate, but you'd discover that the online one is different.

It would be fair that, for online sales, only a single state sales tax applies, or even a single federal one.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Rob C on May 08, 2019, 02:40:58 pm
And you want back there?

;-)

Comes a time that wanting something takes second place to doing the right thing for the next generation's sake.

Having said which, I'm sure a nice place in Watford would still be more expensive than a comparable one in Glasgow. It works the other way around: people sell their place in London and become relative zillionaires when they move to their final retirement property in Perthshire or Wales. Quite where the young natives of those places go is unclear; if it's anything like the effect it has in Mallorca, they just stay at home until they inherit.

:-)
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Robert Roaldi on May 08, 2019, 03:06:34 pm
Cross-state tax differences can't be a new thing. How was it handled in the mail order business back in the day?

If the problem arises because of the ambiguous physical location of the place you are purchasing from, that's a consequence of political jurisdictions not keeping up with the interweb. Maybe politicians should stop screaming at each other on Twitter and figure these things out, since that's what they are paid to do. The web has been around for long enough now.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 08, 2019, 03:47:28 pm
Cross-state tax differences can't be a new thing. How was it handled in the mail order business back in the day?

If the problem arises because of the ambiguous physical location of the place you are purchasing from, that's a consequence of political jurisdictions not keeping up with the interweb. Maybe politicians should stop screaming at each other on Twitter and figure these things out, since that's what they are paid to do. The web has been around for long enough now.

Hi Robert, "Back in the day" the person doing out of state selling didn't worry about it. It was up to the buyer to report the purchase to the state, the county, and the city, and pay sales taxes locally. SURE! Everybody rushed to declare the $25 reflector they just bought from B&H, and pay the $.75 they owed the state, the $.25 they owed the county, and the $.50 they owed the city. At least that would have been the situation when I was mayor of Manitou Springs, Colorado. I don't remember anyone rushing to declare their purchases, and I don't blame them. There was absolutely no reasonable way to track that kind of sale. So, instead of finding a more workable approach, and wanting to cop every penny of tax they could collect, our government put the burden on the seller --  to keep track of thousands of taxing districts. Slobodan just made the point: a single suburb spanning two counties. I agree with Slobodan that the only reasonable solution is a combined sales tax with the feds managing the thing. But do we really want the ultra-efficient federal government handing sales tax? Somehow, the idea leaves me with a dearth of enthusiasm.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Chris Kern on May 08, 2019, 03:54:30 pm
Cross-state tax differences can't be a new thing. How was it handled in the mail order business back in the day?

In general, prior to the Supreme Court ruling I cited earlier in this thread, a state government could only require a retailer to collect sales tax on its behalf if the retailer had a physical presence in the state (e.g., a physical store).

Since the residence of the purchaser determines which state's sales tax applies, merchants only collected sales tax on purchases by residents of a state where they had a physical presence.

The states had the authority to tax purchases by their residents from out-of-state retailers, but I suspect most consumers never even knew if the state where they lived imposed such an obligation.  Generally the only entities that did that were businesses which were claiming retail purchases as business expense deductions from their state income tax liability.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: RSL on May 08, 2019, 04:04:23 pm
Exactly, Chris. So now the government has greatly improved the situation -- from the point of view of the government.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: OmerV on May 08, 2019, 04:37:06 pm
Then sellers on online market places like eBay and Etsy will also be required to collect taxes, if they don’t already. I would think those two and others would benefit by helping the sellers with some system that would automate tax rates.
Title: Re: Email From B&H
Post by: Robert Roaldi on May 08, 2019, 04:59:27 pm
Then sellers on online market places like eBay and Etsy will also be required to collect taxes, if they don’t already. I would think those two and others would benefit by helping the sellers with some system that would automate tax rates.

That's what I would have thought. In my brief 6 year sojourn in the point-of-sale industry, it was just taken for granted that cash register companies had to implement exactly that kind of knowledge in their devices. Someone somewhere (and actually it's many people) know all the tax rules/rates based on geographic location. Making that info available to online sellers is not close to being the most complex thing they do. It could be standard operating procedure. Web sites now deal externally with credit card services as part of a sale, what is so hard about another service request to a tax rate calculator supplier. (I would not be surprised if it already exists in some form.)