You read wrong. The point is that the current controls, which you describe, have stayed the same for, what, 20 years or so. There's so much that could be done to make things even more easier, but isn't being done. Getting rid of manual controls would be, as you said, patently ridiculous at this point in tech.
Excuse me for misunderstanding you then. The only SLR's and DSLR's I'm familiar with are Nikon and Canon, so my comments are based on using them both regularly.
Regarding the D200, if you're referring to the physical buttons and dials on the body than ya, they haven't changed all that much in decades in terms of basic locations and functions from other Nikon bodies since the F5 introduced. Electronics were incorporated on even older cameras for metering and viewfinder displays (and automatic exposure), but it was the development of embedded micro CPU's that allowed for significant changes in both the F5 and EOS-1 interface that haven't changed much to this day.
As one example, I can change the shutter speed and aperture without taking my eye off the view finder; on older cameras one had to set those things by looking at the camera. That was a major change that not everyone liked (Leica users) but most people liked the new paradigm quite a bit.
Digital bodies have more buttons, but Nikon has always done a better job with their implementation than Canon, IMHO dating back to the film days.
If you have some better ideas than what's worked well enough for the legion's of photographers, let us know. There's a few things I would change about my Nikon's, and there's a million things I'd change about my studio mate's 1Dmk2, but I can still use either camera system without too much difficulty.
But if you prefer, almost everything the buttons and dials do can also be done on screen these days, with usability that's on par with in iPod or video game controller. Thoroughly modern, and consistent with other well designed electronic devices.
It's an order of magnitude better than Canon's on screen interface, though I hear they've made some improvements in their newest models. I don't believe they've made improvements to the buttons on the body, though, so overall, the D200/D2x has much better ergonomics overall than any digital Canon I've used to date.
I don't use auto bracketing, but here's what I call tell you about the D200:
Auto mode bracketing choices - choose from: AE + flash, AE only, flash only, or white balance only.
Manual mode bracketing choices - flash+speed, flash+speed+aperture, flash + aperture, or flash only.
ISO is not part of the auto bracketing choices on the D200, nor is auto focus. No matter to me since if I do bracket (rarely) I just do it manually with the on camera controls, but I can certainly see why they'd be useful additions in some cases.
And just so you know, the D200 has 4 memory preset banks, where every change you make from default is automatically stored. I have my preferences set on "A" and my studio partner has his set on "B" which makes sharing the camera quite easy and painless. When I use his 1Dmk2 I spend far too much time fiddling around to tailor it to my liking, and he isn't happy setting it all back because it's so freakin' convoluted.
And FWIW, the more you know about what all those manual controls actually do, the better equipped you are to take better pictures - technical knowledge enables greater creativity.
Kevin