Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?  (Read 10124 times)

Kika Livno

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • http://
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« on: July 31, 2007, 09:55:38 PM »

[span style=\'font-size:13pt;line-height:100%\']PhotoKit Sharpener?  or Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?[/span]


So far I have only used C1 along with PS CS2.

Both companies offer additional plug-ins: Nose reduction, filters, etc.

Which one? Your opinion, tips and advice please!


[span style=\'font-size:13pt;line-height:100%\']Thank you[/span]
Kika
Logged
[span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'][span style='color:gray']Kika Mulitz Livno                                        ......................................................................................[/span][/span]
[span style='color:red'] CANON [/span][span style='color:black'][span style='font-family:Arial']EOS[/span][/span] [span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%'][span style='color:black']1[/span][/span][span style='color:black']Ds [span style='font-family:Arial']MkII [/span][/span] [span style='font-family:Arial'][span style='color:#800000']               EBONY SV[span style='color:Black']45[/span]U2[/span] |  [span style='color:#254117']Schneider[/span] | [span style='color:#254117']Rodenstock[/span] | [span style='color:#254117']Cooke Optics[/span]  
[span style='font-family:Arial']TS-E[/span] 24[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f/3.5[span style='color:red']L [/span] | [span style='font-family:arial']EF[/span] 85[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f/1.2[span style='color:red']L [/span] [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span] | [span style='font-family:Arial']EF[/span] 17-40[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f4[span style='color:red']L [/span] [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span] | [span style='font-family:Arial']EF[/span] 24-70[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f/2.8[span style='color:red']L [/span][/span] [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span] | [span style='font-family:Arial']EF[/span] 70-200[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f2.8[span style='color:red']L [/span] IS [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span]

Tam

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 39
    • http://
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2007, 11:27:02 PM »

photokit sharpener is fabulous.

tam, formerly katemann until I had the nerve to change my email address.
Logged

David White

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 272
    • http://
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2007, 01:59:29 AM »

PhotoKit Sharpener is the only one I use and recommend.  I tried the Nik product and found that it consistently over sharpened at all stages.
Logged
David White

RichWagner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
    • http://www.WildNaturePhotos.com
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2007, 02:16:28 AM »

I'll give another vote for PhotoKit Sharpener. A great product.

--Rich
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7788
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2007, 07:27:20 AM »

Add my vote for Photokit Sharpener. It's easy to use and fully customizable. I also tried Nik Sharpener but I wasn't too impressed. I'd add that Nik is certainly not a bad product but I like PKS better.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2007, 07:27:36 AM by francois »
Logged
Francois

budjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 730
    • http://www.budjamesphotography.com
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2007, 07:41:02 AM »

I own both. Nik tends to oversharpen so if you like really crisp prints, then Nik does a great job.

Photokit Sharpener is less automatic, but is much more flexible as it created a layer containing the results of the sharpening. The sharpening is much more subtle than Nik, but if you want it really "crunchy", you can rerun Photokit to increase the sharpness.

I don't use Nik anymore since purchasing Photokit.

There's my 2 cents.

Cheers.

Bud James
North Wales, PA
Logged
Bud James
North Wales, PA
www.budjamesphotography.com

Philmar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 367
    • http://www.fluidr.com/photos/phil_marion/sets
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2007, 11:15:42 AM »

What about Pixelgenius's sharpening plug-in?
Logged
An office drone pension administrator by day and a photo-enthusiast by night, week-end and on vacation who carries his camera when traveling the world:
Please have a chew on my photos:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/phil_marion/sets

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7788
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2007, 11:23:05 AM »

Quote
What about Pixelgenius's sharpening plug-in?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=131194\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
It's PhotoKit Sharpener (aka PKS)!
Logged
Francois

eleanorbrown

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 632
    • Eleanor Brown Photography
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2007, 12:38:53 PM »

Photokit sharpener does an excellent job and has many options to choose from.  Eleanor

Kika Livno

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • http://
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2007, 11:29:05 AM »

Thanks everybody

!!!Cheers!!!

Kika
Logged
[span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'][span style='color:gray']Kika Mulitz Livno                                        ......................................................................................[/span][/span]
[span style='color:red'] CANON [/span][span style='color:black'][span style='font-family:Arial']EOS[/span][/span] [span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%'][span style='color:black']1[/span][/span][span style='color:black']Ds [span style='font-family:Arial']MkII [/span][/span] [span style='font-family:Arial'][span style='color:#800000']               EBONY SV[span style='color:Black']45[/span]U2[/span] |  [span style='color:#254117']Schneider[/span] | [span style='color:#254117']Rodenstock[/span] | [span style='color:#254117']Cooke Optics[/span]  
[span style='font-family:Arial']TS-E[/span] 24[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f/3.5[span style='color:red']L [/span] | [span style='font-family:arial']EF[/span] 85[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f/1.2[span style='color:red']L [/span] [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span] | [span style='font-family:Arial']EF[/span] 17-40[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f4[span style='color:red']L [/span] [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span] | [span style='font-family:Arial']EF[/span] 24-70[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f/2.8[span style='color:red']L [/span][/span] [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span] | [span style='font-family:Arial']EF[/span] 70-200[span style='font-family:Arial']mm[/span] f2.8[span style='color:red']L [/span] IS [span style='font-family:Arial']USM[/span]

sergiojaenlara

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14
    • http://www.cazandoluces.com
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2007, 02:54:27 AM »

I prefer photokit sharpener over nik sharpener, this one is so hard with the image and I don't see those halos with pixelgenius' plugin.
But If you want to save your money and to have the same if no better results you can use tlr sharpener set of actions. They do an amazing job (it is similar to photokit) at no cost.
You can download it here:

http://www.thelightsrightstudio.com/TLRSharpeningToolkit.htm

(Of course I am a particular, I donīt about this actions programmer).

nemophoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 611
    • Nemo Niemann Photography
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #11 on: August 06, 2007, 10:02:03 AM »

I have both and have used both. I prefer Nik. I use it for both prepress and inkjet with excellent results. It's a tad trickier understanding how to use the sliders to get the best reproduction. Generally, 50-70% works the best, and I like the ability to tweak particular colors (for instance, lower sharpening on skin tones.)

Natasa Stojsic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 139
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2007, 04:21:50 AM »

Quote
I have both and have used both. I prefer Nik. I use it for both prepress and inkjet with excellent results. It's a tad trickier understanding how to use the sliders to get the best reproduction. Generally, 50-70% works the best, and I like the ability to tweak particular colors (for instance, lower sharpening on skin tones.)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=131752\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I like Nik Sharpener Pro, especially Nik Color Efex Pro
Logged
[span style='font-size:11pt;line-height:100%'][span style='color:black']N a t a s a   S t o j s i c[/span][/span][span style='color:gray']  .......................................................................................................................................... [/span]
[span style='color:gray']PHASE[/span][span style='color:skyblue']ONE[/span] [span style='color:gray']P30[span style='font-size:7pt;line-height:100%']+[/span][/span]| [span style='color:red']MAMIYA[/span] [span style='color:gray']645 AFD II [/span]  [span style='font-family:impact'][span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%'][span style='color:#98AFC7'] | 28mm f4.5 D. AF | 35mm f3.5 AF | 55-110mm f4.5 AF Zoom | 80mm f2.8 AF | 120mm f4.0 MF Macro | 150mm f3.5 AF[/span][/span][/span]

paulbk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 480
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2007, 04:45:45 PM »

Once you get the hang of it, and it don't take long, Photokit Sharpener is by far the most flexible (read: best) sharpening tool around. And you don't need a sliderule to use it.

Sharpening is always done on an adjustment layer. Discrete layers for dark and light contrast bands adjustable using layer opacity.

It's also a smart tool. It knows (calculates) "just how much" sharpening to apply for a given image of x by y pixels.

A very usable tool for advanced users or new comers.

p
« Last Edit: August 23, 2007, 04:49:56 PM by paulbk »
Logged
paul b. kramarchyk
Barkhamsted, Connecticut, USA

Philmar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 367
    • http://www.fluidr.com/photos/phil_marion/sets
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2007, 05:06:02 PM »

I don't print my digital photos - they are for web viewing only. Also, I convert RAWs in ACR and will be using ACR as my capture source sharpener.

Is there any point in getting the Photokit Sharpener if my output source is always the web and my capture sharpening will be done by ACR?
Logged
An office drone pension administrator by day and a photo-enthusiast by night, week-end and on vacation who carries his camera when traveling the world:
Please have a chew on my photos:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/phil_marion/sets

Richowens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 873
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2007, 06:02:29 PM »

Why not download PK and try it for a week. Pixel Genius has a 7 day trial and a money back guarantee.

 I tried it for about two hours and bought it without hesitation.

 Even though your photos are for web only, once you learn how to use it, you will notice a difference in before and after.

 Try it, you have nothing to lose but a little time.

 Rich

Philmar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 367
    • http://www.fluidr.com/photos/phil_marion/sets
PhotoKit Sharpener? OR Nik Sharpener Pro 2.0?
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2007, 10:44:13 AM »

Quote
Why not download PK and try it for a week. Pixel Genius has a 7 day trial and a money back guarantee.

 I tried it for about two hours and bought it without hesitation.

 Even though your photos are for web only, once you learn how to use it, you will notice a difference in before and after.

 Try it, you have nothing to lose but a little time.

 Rich
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=135125\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Fair enough but it's only free for a week, then what? I don't need to spend $100 for a plug-in that will only be used for output sharpening to the web. PK looks like a fantastic tool but it does so much more than what I need. I think it is great that it can be set depending on what ink, printer or paper one uses but I don't print. It has great capture sharpening capabilities but ACR 4.1 is more than sufficient for my capture sharpening needs. I love its mask creation. So I don't need to buy a $100 plug-in with capture and creative/content sharpening choices since I don't need them.
If I didn't use ACR 4.1 for capture sharpening then no doubt the PK sharpener would make sense. I am sure it is a great product from all accounts.
 If I was printing my shots I think PK sharpening plug-in would be a neccessary tool.
Really, all I require is output sharpening to web for images at 1100 pixel length.
I can write my own PS action. Just need a few pearls of wisdom from more experienced digital photogs. What would be the best sharpening tool to use for ouput sharpening to web for a 1100 pixel length photo?
USM?
Smart sharpen?
High pass?
Logged
An office drone pension administrator by day and a photo-enthusiast by night, week-end and on vacation who carries his camera when traveling the world:
Please have a chew on my photos:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/phil_marion/sets
Pages: [1]   Go Up