if i compare these samples with my P30 800....well i guess i should not...first i am known hass hater #1 here and second it is really hard to tell what is jpeg stuff and what is noise/grain....
the P30 shows more grain....but is much cleaner in terms of: no blotchiness, no smearing...especially in the shadows (this must be the jepg compression)...these files look like major noise reduction to me....blotchy and soft....and no grain.....i will provide some raw files if someone wants to put them on a server for download......so we can compare raw files....let me know if anyone wants to host....i can also do longer nightshots....whatever....
i never use any noise reduction, i much prefer seeing grain, the harder the better, reminds me of film....which is why i like 800 with the P30.....
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I don't know anyting about the H31 and have only shot a few frames of any hasselblad back.
I do know that the P-30 is just mind blowing.
I NEVER do this, but this link is un retouiched, from the P-30, some Canon files and a few Aptus files (the black and whites).
The are non processed screen shots from lightroom and most of the P-30 images even look better and cleaner in C-1, but regarldess the P-30 just rocked me. I shot most of this with tungsten, mostly at 400 iso and I though like Paul says there is some noise but it's a little film like so not objecitonable.
[a href=\"http://www.russellrutherfordgroup.com/screen_shots/]http://www.russellrutherfordgroup.com/screen_shots/[/url]
http://www.russellrutherfordgroup.com/work_in_progress.movThe P30 shots will have a 4:3 ratio and just for clairty, I shot the black and white withthe Aptus and purposely pushed up the shadows to show noise,
so don't judge the Aptus by these images for typical pixel peeping as it was for effect. Actually I think quite a nice effect.
JR
