True story: in Public Speaking class final in which I had gotten a 37, I found the teacher had given me the score from the number wrong, not the number right. I actually had a 63 which was a D-. When I brought this up to her attention, she acknowledged the mistake but still found another 6 points to take off, thereby still flunking me. That this has anything to do with this discussion I have no idea, but I always wanted to tell the world ... OK, maybe that the teacher's or judge's impression is the one that counts, right or wrong.
I also tend to not comment rather than comment negatively, unless directly requested. Sometimes we don't particularly like an image and can't really place exactly why. It just doesn't appeal to us, doesn't click. Maybe this is the case here.
I also don't like to judge people so I always give them the benefit of the doubt. Rather than assume someone was trying to be rude, I'll just assume they didn't know how to express themselves politely. Frankly I'm often appalled at the writing I find on the internet :laugh:.
To get back to Jonathan's image, it frankly did not appeal to me on initial impression, but I realize it was probably a victim of "web prep". I have a feeling that the original had better dynamic range which got mushed by the JPEG compression, and between that and the pixel downsizing what was an interesting study in shades and texture got wacked by the web ...
I hope to be done with my China images tonight or tomorrow, so you'll all get a chance to rip'em up - no worries, I frankly don't care .
Cheers,
DJ