Just to add a few parameters to the discussion.
1) Some paper manufacturers have a reputation for providing very high quality profiles with their papers. Personally, I have no interest in adding in the additional complexity and expense of profiling paper myself. Early on in my days of using the Epson 3880 I simply assumed that, of course, they must be providing very high quality profiles for their branded papers. It wasn't until I started printing with Canson Baryta Photographique and the Canson profiles that I appreciated the difference, not only in the "quality" of the paper, but also the excellence of the profile. I have read that Canson is renowned for the excellence of their profiles and that has certainly been my experience with the Epson 3880 and Canon iPF8400 using Canson Baryta, Platine, and Rag Photographique. Canson does provide profiles for the Canon Pixma Pro-100 so I would count that as a positive.
2) Price is a significant factor for many of us in the decision of which paper to use. In general, Hahnemuhle and Moab are simply too expensive for me to be comfortable using for my personal printing no matter how serious I am about it. I've built a spreadsheet to help me evaluate which papers are well priced since sizes and quantities vary. And by shopping carefully, from time to time, I have found some significant price opportunities in the Canson papers and I have stocked up on them when that has occurred. For example, right now you can buy a box of 17"x22" Canson Rag Photographique 310 GSM from B&H for $94.95 delivered. That doesn't do you any good since you are using a 13" wide printer but it is a very good and anomalous price. From what I have read on dpreview.com there are occasionally sales on the Canon papers meant for the Pixma Pro-100 that have 3 for 1 and even 5 for 1 sales. But I have no idea what their quality is. Right now you can buy the Canson Baryta in 13x19" sheets from Inkjetmall.com for $54.12 plus shipping (use WEEKLY20 for the coupon code). Their shipping is a little expensive but if you buy multiple boxes it is less of a factor.
3) Texture or surface is a big deal. I don't simply mean matte versus glossy. A lot of fine art papers, especially the matte rag papers, have quite a bit of surface texture. Nobody can tell you if you will prefer the surface on one paper over another. That is one of the reasons people here are so reluctant to recommend any one paper as the best. For my photographic style surface texture interferes with the print, but many pictures benefit greatly from a more textured paper. That is particularly true with B&W prints where the texture can feel quite luxurious. Papers also vary in how they show gloss differential and bronzing and those differences are often printer specific.
There are many people on here with much more experience and skill than I have but it is hard to get them to actually make a specific paper recommendation because it is so subjective and printer specific. For my purposes, I have decided that the Canson Platine Fibre Rag and the Canson Rag Photographique 310 gsm are the papers I am going to standardize my printing on. Both are heavy papers with great hand feel and no OBA's. They have excellent profiles for my printers and the prints I make on them are amazing. From 5' away looked at dead on I can't tell the difference between the two papers. Up close the Canson Platine has just a shade more vibrancy which is the "pop" that a glossier surface gives you. Viewed from the side the Rag Photographique is the winner since there is absolutely no glare. I couldn't tell you that one is better than the other. There may be better papers out there but those two will meet my needs for the foreseeable future. Naturally, your mileage may vary.