I'm perhaps an old fuddy-duddy, but the old site was easier to scan quickly, easier on the eye, and it was clearer what you (the owners) thought were the important headline articles. The new site offers a democratisation of layout that mimic's any other site that doesn't have it's own editorial opinions. And it was having an opinion (shown in a criteria led layout) that was so good about the old LuLa. And it looked far different to the 'drag-n-drop' design of other sites. Now it is an anonymous bland offering that copies (other site layouts) rather than informs, it was never a problem instantly recognising a new article to read in the old LuLa, now I can hardly be bothered to try and find one.
Steve