Looking at the dpreview samples, the only thing I see that is a bit troubling is the bokeh on the 1.4 to 2.8 shots, it's not very smooth IMO. The center of the image where I assume the focus was taken looks good.
I briefly owned the Nikkor 24 1.4 and I would agree that for outdoor landscapes it was an excellent lens, however my main interest was night photography and the coma aberration on the the 24 1.4 G was terrible. It was strange as I did not see much corner/edge smearing in daylight work, but the butterfly lights at night and starscapes were really terrible until around F3.5 and to me that pretty much defeated the need for 1.4 as I could better work or equal work with my 14-24 at F2.8.
I hated to sell the Nikon 24 and thought I might have a bad lens, and sent it back for another one, and the 2nd one was exactly the same. I have read since that the coma issue on the 24 1.4 is found by most photographers.
Hopefully more tests will come in better lighting/subject matter.
Paul