Huh!? If I did, then address that, not guns.
And most of them had managed to leave it behind. My old headmaster was a tank commander at Normandy BTW, and would have railed very strongly against any movement directed against any faith.
If his family had been lined up, shot, and beheaded, he might not have been so forgiving.
There have been twelve deaths in France due to terrorist activity, which is deeply saddening, but thankfully still a rather rare occurrence. Yet we look across to the Atlantic and note in some disbelief that over 12,000 Americans were slaughtered by their own people last year! Is it any wonder some may think it legitimate to consider the possibility of double standards being involved?
the value of any discussion is diminished by absence of the other side... the real other side that is...
the value of any discussion is diminished by absence of the other side... the real other side that is.
Are you seriously proposing that one can't have a valid discussion about terrorism unless ISIS or Al-Qaeda operatives are part of the conversation?
Honestly J.W. from here it looks as if you need some therapy to help you let go.
I think Jonathan raised a valid question. Ad hominems only weaken one's own position.Cheers,Bart