You stitch 100-megapixel shots? My God, what do you end up with? How large do you print? Where do you keep the Cray you use for processing?My mind boggles, Bernard.And the same goes for you, Steven!
So for genres such as landscape, it doesn’t make much sense to spend 10 times for the best image quality if you are too lazy to stitch. Because the boy next door who does stitch will end up with the better print.
There are images in landscape photography which is hard to stitch, for example if you incorporate some moving element - rolling clouds, waves, etc. Also having the same pixels doesn't necessarily mean that the quality of that pixel would be identical. I'm thinking about different CFA, or the on-chip phase detection would cause some difference.This example was shot during the weekend with a Phase One IQ4 150MP on an XT with a 23mm Rodenstock lens.
GFX100 + 110mm f2.0A lucky shot... look at the eye... Still, this is the only MF camera with which you have more than one chance in a million to achieve this kind of results on moving subjects.Cheers,Bernard
It is a lovely shot, Bernard.
I agree beautiful shot Bernard. As always you do great work.