That is certainly correct, but the comparison I linked to was the 50 'lux on the M240 vs the Zony 55 on the a7. Both 24MP, both FF.
Jim
Now I'm truly concerned. Have shot many an image with an M240 with both my 50's, a -cron and a Noctulux and would be very disappointed seeing that image in my monitor.
Again, no insult intended but there that's a bit amazing. I must say that the LV of the M240 is no place for critical focus. The outboard EVF is is far better, especially with mag. But for a 50 I would always use the RF if possible. Nothing in my experience is as accurate and if you're shooting wide open, especially a Noctulux the light is quite low so sometimes I can't use the RF and default to the EVF. Never ever LV, even with mag though... they end up looking like that far too often
OK, checked out the OTUS vs. -lux 50.
- I have never shot with an OTUS so cannot comment completely on this particular test from that standpoint.
- the 1.4 -lux is not the sharpest of the 50mm m offerings. Better the -cron. I won't hold out for the new APO -cron since it's very rare and even if it was in stock I'd have serious considerations about plunking down N of $8K+ for that package
- Finally, it occurs that the -lux images are once again OOF. Sorry, but I expect much more from the M-glass than your test demonstrates.
Turns out I've done some head to head with the A7s and the M240 with a couple of M-lenses. Will look around and try to figure how to post to this site successfully.
No question of your integrity and knowledge, but that's just OOF until proven otherwise to me...