I'd like to see them separating camera body and digital back again, the H5 camera body should actually be H5X, and you should be able to buy the H5 digital magazines separately, just like Phase One backs. So if you're a tech cam user you can buy the back only. Head-on competition with Phase One and Leaf.
And then of course lowering prices and further go towards a volume model, sell in "regular" camera stores, and make the camera really robust like any camera should be so we could see these type of demonstrations:
(image showing Pentax 645z).
And drop the luxury b*llsh*t. Make Hasselblad the number one serious MF camera for a broad user base professionals and amateurs. One can see the popularity of high resolution DSLRs as a threat to MF, but it's only a threat to the old MF business model with inflated prices. Functionality-wise this popularity means that there are many willing to move into MF if the price is not too steep, this is an opportunity. Probably it's politically impossible to make a price slash in one single move (would upset current customers and dealers), but one could lower prices step by step. Making an "amateur" model say a copy of H5D-50c but stripped of tethering (which pros need) could open up for separate pricing, just like the CFV-50c has separate pricing today (as it cannot be used on the H system).
Hasselblad should also hire someone that actually knows what a tech cam is, and make a clear marketing message. They've had superior tech wide performance all the time with the Kodak 50 megapixel sensor, yet they've failed to inform the customers about that.
Concerning digital back they lag behind in feature set compared to Phase One. I don't think they need to be best there, just have a decency level in terms of features and then focus on robustness and long-term support. I think that will be appreciated.