D810 support?

[Iliah]

> Another political not technological excuse.

Yes, but the whole thing is more about politics than anything else.

[digitaldog]

> Another political not technological excuse.
Yes, but the whole thing is more about politics than anything else.

And sadly these days, it appears far more difficult to fix anything political than technological.

[Iliah]

>>> Another political not technological excuse.
>> Yes, but the whole thing is more about politics than anything else.
> And sadly these days, it appears far more difficult to fix anything political than technological.
Before fixing anything political, maybe not to break anything political on the first place.

[Bart_van_der_Wolf]

It is the problem with metadata, and it is not a problem with raw format, and metadata problems can't be solved by DNG.
Is is also a problem with raw converter updates schedule.

Exactly!

Cheers,
Bart

[ErikKaffehr]

Hi Iliah,

from Wikipedia: "Digital Negative (DNG) is an open lossless raw image format"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Negative

The way I see it DNG defines a lot of tags, like color conversion matrices. Some of it is mandatory and some are recommendations.

Best regards
Erik

Dear  Erik,

DNG is not a format, it is a container, and it solves nothing. Problem is, decoding raw format is not an issue. You can roll back dcraw to about 3 years ago and it will decode D810 NEFs. Problem is metadata. And DNG explicitly allows un-documented metadata tags.

[Iliah]

Dear Erik,

Wiki is a poor source. DNG can contain both lossy and lossless raw data, and it can also contain linear demosaicked images. The tags that are pre-determined in DNG are not enough for many purposes. Say, one has a stitched sensor, like semi-MF or Nikon FX. Have you seen any DNG tags that control flat fielding? 2 matrices are not enough for many purposes as well, that is why the whole DCP thing was developed, and even that does not solve everything.

[Camdavidson]

I would rather wait the few weeks for the C1 update then mess around with a quick (market driven) response by Adobe.  My D810 arrived the day it was released.  I tested the camera with the Adobe Camera RAW RC version that "supports" the D810.  The results, were lacking IMO.  The Nikon Capture NX-D processed files were much cleaner and showed the cameras strengths. 

Waiting a few weeks for Phase One to update Capture One is worth it to me.  C1 does an exceptional job with Nikon files and I expect that the D810 files processed with Capture One will be up to their high standards. 

[Linda398]

I am sure they will eventually etui tab 3 10.1 housse samsung galaxy tab 3 10.1

[swisscheese]

There is a beta 7.2.4 available, but I did not try it yet:

http://leblogaaphoto.wordpress.com

Markus

[Paul2660]

It's there in C1 8, now released.

Paul

[BernardLanguillier]

It's there in C1 8, now released.

Paul

Yes, working very well too!



Cheers,
Bernard