Subscribe for $1/month
Login
Videos
Luminous Landscape Home
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
April 29, 2024, 03:13:33 pm
Home
Help
Search
Login (forum only)
Login (Subscriber)
Register
Luminous Landscape Home
Luminous Landscape Forum
>
The Art of Photography
>
User Critiques
>
Poppy's sex organs
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Poppy's sex organs (Read 1123 times)
PeterAit
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 4560
Poppy's sex organs
«
on:
June 04, 2014, 01:44:24 pm »
The flower, that is! Stamens and carpel of a red poppy. FWIW, this is a 1100 x 1000 crop from a 4592 x 3448 original and shows the great optical quality of this lens: Olympus 50mm f/2 ED macro on Panasonic G3.
Logged
Peter
www.peteraitken.com
wmchauncey
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 793
Re: Poppy's sex organs
«
Reply #1 on:
June 04, 2014, 08:11:36 pm »
Judging lens quality from a web based image is an exercise in futility.
Logged
The things you do for yourself die with
stamper
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 5882
Re: Poppy's sex organs
«
Reply #2 on:
June 05, 2014, 04:06:13 am »
Surely if the lens had been of poor quality then likewise the image would have been the same? As it is the image is a fine example of flower photography. Methinks you are jealous?
Logged
http://www.flickr.com/photos/99408200@N05/
PeterAit
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 4560
Re: Poppy's sex organs
«
Reply #3 on:
June 05, 2014, 07:38:08 am »
Quote from: wmchauncey on June 04, 2014, 08:11:36 pm
Judging lens quality from a web based image is an exercise in futility.
I disagree, at least when it comes to sharpness. An unsharp image could be from a bad lens or bad technique, but a sharp image - easily visible on the web - cannot come about without a sharp lens.
Logged
Peter
www.peteraitken.com
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Luminous Landscape Forum
>
The Art of Photography
>
User Critiques
>
Poppy's sex organs
Loading...