Rob, just wanted to add something to look at. Not claiming anything new. I enjoy in-camera movement and multiple exposure photography and the look, and that's why I do it.
JR
Yeah, of course, and that's perfectly fine, but that isn't the point: the point is that - what the hell is the point? - I have to check - hang on!
Got it! Yes, Andrew's article. The value or otherwise
of additional text. The only additional text you've used is your © protector, but hey, unless it's plastered across a face, any reasonable retoucher can get round that and rip you off. ;-) That's to what I referred.
As mentioned before, in my own case, I find the idea of going out with a wordy programme in mind is counterproductive. I prefer to be lazy and receptive, like a seasoned concubine. Later, when I finish the picture, it can come to me out of nowhere, just as did the shot, that some play on words fits! Why not? Other times, I can stare and stare at the thing and nothing materializes out of the keyboard. Which is a drag because, by now, the website's stuck in a look that I can't break, or I'd feel obliged to start all over again. So if no words comes, neither does the snap hit the site.
How complictated we can make our lives. This is fun?
Rob