I tried v3.5 Beta but gave up, because of several bugs. Perhaps these have been eliminated. Overall, I liked the program. Like Qimage, which is very popular with Windows users, ImageNest utilizes the Printer's own driver. In the end, I went with ImagePrint, which is in a different league altogether, but is also much more expensive. I think that if IN had been bug-free, I would have stuck with it, although I'm glad that I did not. ImagePrint's profiles are first rate, and the ability to soft proof gray images is a huge advantage.
Rob