Hi,
Here are two studio shots with APS-C (Sony Alpha 55 SLT Sony 16-80/3.5-4.5 ZA) and "FX", Sony Alpha 900 24-70/2.8 ZA, the link has both JPEG and RAW (DNG) images:
http://echophoto.dnsalias.net/ekr/images/Demos/ApsVsFX/An actual pixels crop (APS-C blown up to 6036 width) is shown below (left Alpha 900 right Alpha 55SLT)
Your mileage may vary. A smaller format (APS-C) will make larger demands on the lenses than a larger format. So a very good lens on an APS-C camera may outperform a mediocre lens on FX. Regarding the Sony NEX-7, the E-mount lenses are generally not very impressive.
I have both APS-C (Sony Alpha 700 and Alpha 55 SLT) and full frame (Sony Alpha 900), I can make A2-prints of excellent quality with both systems. On a recent shoot I had problems with subject motion caused by wind, so I shot with both my Sony Alpha 900 with it's 70-300/4.5-5.6G and my Sony Alpha 55 SLT with my Sony 24-70/2.8 ZS. On the APS-C camera I used larger aperture and higher ISO and actually got sharper pictures. See the enclosed screen dump. Sony Alpha 55 SLT on top, both images scaled to about 6000 pixels height.
Nikon is expected to announce an 36MP full frame camera (D800?) any time now.
To sum up:
- FX is probably better all other factors kept similar
- Sony NEX lenses may be less sharp
- On the other hand you can put anything on a Sony NEX
- Mirrorless will have no vibration from flipping mirror
Best regards
Erik
Differences in image quality with enlargements made from an APS-C sensor with 24 megapixels (Sony Nex-7) and an FX sensor with 24 megapixels (Nikon D3x). Will the smaller sensor (APS-C) produce better results?