Luminous Landscape Home
Luminous Landscape Forum > Raw & Post Processing, Printing > Digital Image Processing > Ninkon stack loaders sf 200 vs sf 210
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ninkon stack loaders sf 200 vs sf 210  (Read 3452 times)

dseelig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 596
Ninkon stack loaders sf 200 vs sf 210
« on: May 16, 2011, 09:46:18 am »
Anyone know is the 210 really better then the 200 thanks David
Logged

JohnHeerema

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 241
  • Dr. John Heerema
    • http://www.heerema.ca
Re: Ninkon stack loaders sf 200 vs sf 210
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2011, 01:50:23 pm »
I believe that they are the same, except that the slide thickness can be adjusted on the 210. I have the 210, and can't see how the fixed thickness could have ever worked, as I have to adjust the thickness for each type of mount I scan.
Logged

degrub

  • Guest
Re: Ninkon stack loaders sf 200 vs sf 210
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2011, 12:01:27 am »
it's exactly that. Either will work fine once you follow all the tips to fine tune it. Should still be able to google it . i use the credit card trick  on my 200. Worked great on old cardboard mounts. you will learn to inspect the mounts for really bad ones. Those are better in the single feed slot.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Luminous Landscape Forum > Raw & Post Processing, Printing > Digital Image Processing > Ninkon stack loaders sf 200 vs sf 210