Those of us that have taken the stance that UV filtration (as opposed to software based correction) was the way to go for years now are laughing all the way to work. For years I've recommended that those purchasing EyeOnePros buy the UV Cut version, unless of course they have the need to characterize the amount of OBAs a paper has. Of course talking about this stuff can be a bit religious and the louder voices on LuLu have generally been in the UVin camp. Those that were unfortunate enough to buy a unfiltered EyeOnePro lately should do their own UVin/UVex tests with i1P. You'l find the differences to be really really small unless you're dealing with crazy, super bright white papers. As for myself, I've done exhaustive testing and the jury has long been in. I think the negative publicity from all of this has been a bit overblown.
Don't forget that the software based correction (now old, abandoned technology) was only for the Perceptual intent, not others. Devices like the DTP70 and iSis that are capable of recording both UVin and UVex data have a great approach and I think we'll see more of this in the future.