In a review of the GH2 and 100-300mm lens some time ago, Michael suggested that it might be the perfect camera to take to Africa. My wife and I just returned from three weeks in Botswana and Zambia as part of a 12 person group led by George Lepp and Dana Allen. I shot with D700 and D300 bodies using the Nikon 200-400mm f4, with a few shots using the 70-200mm f2.8. My wife took a GH2 with the 14-140mm and 100-300mm lenses. The GH2 had a few drawbacks: it is not as useful as either Nikon body in low light and it is hard to hand hold and get a sharp image at 300mm, especially of moving animals where the motor drive is painfully slow. I am just starting to print some of the images we took at 11x14 and 16x20 full frame. In situations where we both were taking pictures of the same subject, I am unable to see any significant difference in image quality between the prints taken by the GH2 versus the d700 when the prints are looked at at nomal viewing distance. If you pixel peep at a distance of a few inches using a 4x magnifying glass, the D700 usually seems to have better resolution, but the difference seems to vanish at normal viewing distance. My kit weighed over 30 lbs; she carried less than 4 lbs. I'm starting to rethink what I want to lug through airport security and customs on future 30 hour trips!