Hi Chris
I wonder if you are making life difficult for yourself? You mentioned T-Max, which is a film that I have never used; it came in at a time when I was working exclusively in Kodachrome and b/w was far behind me, not because I didn't love it, but because of the nature of the work I found.
Now, anything I read about it in technical revues etc. seemed to indicate that it was a difficult material to handle well; that it required very exact exposure and ditto processing. Can I suggest that, if it is still available - I no longer buy any film to add to the clutter of unused stuff already in the freezer! - that you try out TXP 120? I found it to have great latitude and that I could pull miracles out of it, not by extending development which I never did, but simply because of its flexibility and lack of violent contrast. The latter might well be due to my standardized D76 1+1 processing system and rating the film at 320 and exposing for the darkest part of the important bits in the shot. The opposite of tranny exposure, in other words. However, it worked. I did not like it at all on 35mm, where I found Ilford's HP3/4 versions better to my purposes. That flies in the face of received wisdom, where many 35mm shooters swore by TXP.
Perhaps I understand now what disturbed me about the beach shot with kites. You mention trying to avoid the people: that's exactly my point I think, when I said the subject was missing. It wasn't so much it was missing as you wanting them to be out of it almost altogether: you were trying to express the feeling of them intruding into the otherwise virgin space! That's a difficult concept to do for anyone, certainly without captions to steer thought and perception!
Rob C