Sounds like you have it going now.
Yes, Thank you for your help!
I would profile the Hahn Photo Rag Baryta using the HP Baryte Satin Art setting and see if there is any improvement.
I do not have any of HP Baryte Satin Art setting in the paper list in my z. I did not ever delete anything.
... sounds like that GE setting being less than 100% was at least part of your problem.
I think that was the only problem...
I also think I picked the "right" images for my tests. The ones that show the trace of bronzing and gloss differencial even at 100%GE have a variety of large areas of similar level of whites, grays and blacks connecting to each other. For example huge thunder clouds over a lake , shot on BW film through a red filter. The transition from the white cloud to the almost black sky show the gloss differences and some bronzing in darker areas. But I have to look for them under some 10-15 d. angle to see. Although barely noticable they are there. None of it can be seen on the HP Pro Satin no matter how hard I look.
Some other images with smaller same tone areas BW images on HM PRB look as perfect as it gets.
I like the Photo Rag Baryta but think it is somewhat over-rated...At least at the price being 2x of HP Pro Satin.
Next thing to do is to apply some warm tonning to my HP Prof Satin images to match the warmer rendring of the MH PRB and see if I can tell one from another ...
During this test I have put an HP Prof Satin BW print next to a darkroom print on an Ilford MC Fiber and I can't tell them apart.
Is there a difference between "HP Baryte Photo" paper and "HP Baryte Satin Art" paper?
I have no experience with neither if those papers, which in reality could be the same thing.
I have double checked and I do not have "HP Baryte Satin Art" in my z.
But I have "HP Baryte Photo" and "Photo Paryte Paper" in the z. Both under Photo Paper category and both having identical settings including GE=48%