yes.
one point among various others which are related only to mf type sensors and cameras.
( ... magenta-green should be a well known keyword for your too , although these kodak sensor designs are used in 35mm by the M and formerly the kodak 14n/slr as well )
I've seen horrible xtreme mag-green with the 14n I must say, but that was some years ago.
Back with this Leica S2 article, a point I regret that has not been discussed, is the dslr design choice.
The S2 proposal makes me perplex on that. I don't understand why it is not possible to combine both worlds???
I mean, a dslr design and usability, but with removable back.
Sinar did something in that way with the M, although this Sinar is pretty big.
[attachment=22872:11791683...inar_m_b.jpg]
The biggest problem I see with this Leica, is that it will not be fast enough to please the dslr users, and not versatile enough to please the MF users.
Even if they improve the tether and the lens range.
When sensor is obsolete, and they are quite fast, the all body will have to be buy again, but this is another story than upgrading the C Mark...
The Pentax can handle that because it is much cheaper.
But, why MF manufacturers are not "wilder" when it comes to designing their bodies and their backs lcd?
The Sinar M design style, on diet and with a powerfull lcd and connections will truly be a winner.
But the sad story, is that such a system will probably be done by the "big boys" before MF brands will have reacted on time.
And when it's too late it's too late.
I hope that Leica and others will put their designers on the drawing board very soon and finally come with more drastic solutions.
Edit: Rainer, I've seen after writing my post that you are using the Sinar M. Coincidence? Anyway, I'd like you to comment about your feeling on this design.
Do you feel a better usability than with other MF cameras ? the M being let's say a modular philosophy and closer to a dslr design.
That would be interesting to have your thoughts. Thanks.