Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: An Epson R2880 review  (Read 3550 times)

keith_cooper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 473
    • Northlight Images
An Epson R2880 review
« on: December 21, 2009, 08:42:57 am »

I know the printer's been round for a while, but I figured that it was now available at some good prices  - low enough to make it a potential choice for relatively low volume print work (portfolios etc)

I've written up a review of my experiences with the printer.
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews...on_sp_2880.html

Thanks to Epson UK for lending me one - our normal 'small' printer here is a 7880, so it's interesting to see how print quality compares with the 2880

Logged
bye for now -- Keith
[url=http://www.nor

fike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1413
  • Hiker Photographer
    • trailpixie.net
An Epson R2880 review
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2009, 09:26:35 am »

Quote from: keith_cooper
I know the printer's been round for a while, but I figured that it was now available at some good prices  - low enough to make it a potential choice for relatively low volume print work (portfolios etc)

I've written up a review of my experiences with the printer.
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews...on_sp_2880.html

Thanks to Epson UK for lending me one - our normal 'small' printer here is a 7880, so it's interesting to see how print quality compares with the 2880

It sounds like my old 2400, but more.  Really, it looks nearly identical, except perhaps with the new vivid magenta.  Paper handling and some of the same issues remain with feeding art papers.  

As I was printing holiday cards this weekend, I was thinking that my 2400 had been through a lot of printing.  I thought that most of these 2400 (2880 too) printers are probably sold to people who are merely dabbling in fine art photo printing because getting good, consistent results can be tricky at times, particularly if you want to use various papers or roll paper.  I imagine lots of lonely 2400 sitting on the corner of computer desks.  Small, expensive ink cartridges are probably the biggest single problem.  

for my money, my next small printer will be the 3880.  It's cartridge feed would be the perfect compliment to my larger format 7880 roll paper printer.
Logged
Fike, Trailpixie, or Marc Shaffer

keith_cooper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 473
    • Northlight Images
An Epson R2880 review
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2009, 11:10:36 am »

Yes, relatively minor changes in some areas.

I've several associated paper 'reviews' to publish with the 2880 review (I prefer to stick to OEM papers for actual printer reviews) and was chatting with a supplier who dropped off a load of boxes of paper to test.

Neither of us could quite pin down the market the 2880 was aimed at (at its full price) since we'd both have gone for a 3800/3880. Nor for that matter, could we quite pin down the economics going on in the heads of CIS users for this size printer. There is a definite market for such systems, but every supplier who's been honest with me has admitted to wondering just the same (despite what the marketing materials suggest ;-)  )  I know they have their fans, but it smacks too much of shoving a big V8 into an old Ford Escort (pick suitable small car for your country ;-) ) and not changing the transmission/suspension/brakes/steering.
Logged
bye for now -- Keith
[url=http://www.nor

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4344
    • A Goldhammer Photography
An Epson R2880 review
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2009, 11:51:04 am »

Keith's review is a fair one.  I bought a 2880 a year ago as I was beginning to move everything into the digital world.  At the time there was a $200 rebate on this printer which put it into a nice price range.  I wasn't sure what my printing volume would be (as I'm more of a hobbyist and don't need the income from photography).  Eric Chan has written on his website that the 2880 produces better prints than the 3800 under certain conditions (" I have seen the results from other Epson models that possess this newer tech (like the R2880) and found them superior to what the original 3800 could produce on Photo Black-compatible papers, particularly in saturated yellow-green areas and red-magenta areas.").  At the one year point, I have probably still spent somewhat less money than if I bought the 3800 but may reach the break point on cost with the next purchase of ink cartridges.  This printer does print well and I do not need the roll feature.  The rear single sheet feed is quirky as Keith notes though I am acclimated to this and seem not to have the same problems that I had when I first started printing (matte papers are more problematic and do require a quick brushing before printing).  I don't regret purchasing this printer and it's served me quite well (even helping carve out a niche note card business).  When it comes time to replace it, I'll certainly get the 3880 as it will allow for slightly larger prints.  As to recommending to friends, the 2880 is solid and performs but as noted, it's cost depends on the amount of printing one is going to do.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up