It's hard to compare the Schneider and Rodenstock specifications and I'm probably making some mistake but if I convert Schneider's illumination fall-off into stops i.e. 50% is one stop, 25% two stops, 12.5% three stops then there doesn't seem to be a great deal of difference in fall-off between the Schneider 43mm and the Rodenstock 40mm. This seems rather surprising.
Having used the Rodenstock a bit it is phenomenally sharp even at F5.6 but on paper it has a lot more distortion. I wonder if the greater coverage the Schneider offers is borne out in practice.