Hi,
The MF also lacks microlenses. Both microlenses and large fill factor reduces aliasing. Simply enough, if the fill factor is larger the probability of light from a single point hitting several pixels is increased.
MF sensors have larger pixel pitch. A 24 MPixel FX camera is about 6 microns per pixel, meaning that the Nyquist limit is about 83 lp/mm, while a P25+ operates at 9 microns/pixel. Nyquist limit for a P25 is thus 55 lp/mm. A very good MF lens probably has a better MTF at 55 lp/mm than a very good 135 lens at 80 lp/mm.
I have never seen 80 lp/mm MTF figures for a 135 lens, but the best MF lenses seem to achieve 60% MTF at 40 lp/mm. Schneider APO digitars achive 60 % MTF at 60 lp/mm.
For that simple reason it's pretty obvious that a P25 or P21 will be a lot sharper than any 135 lens, at optimum aperture and correctly focused.
Best regards
Erik
Good question, what lens?
Yes RAW files would help.
I wonder how the lens for the MF compares to the SRL lens.
Another question...on Canon there is only 1 filter of the 2 removed when doing a AA filter removal as 1 of 2 is glued to the sensor. What is the case for the D3x?... Is there 1 or 2 filters removed or is filtering different with Nikon? The MF has 0 filters.