Just interesting about Hartblei, when did it become a German company? As far as I know, this was just a group of people in Kiev, Ukraine, who were "upgrading" and "tuning" Kiev m/f cameras ( http://www.hartblei.com/ ), something like Arax ( http://araxfoto.com/ ). Nothing special, just artisan undertaking.
http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/came...tblei-cam.shtml
Immensely interesting camera and review.I wonder if the 35mm super-teles have equally large image circles, like their large-format counterparts.Is there any compatible film back? Hasselblad A12 would need a film transport mechanism.Pedro
well I can tell you the Leica R modular doesnt-it is fine on P45+ with 1.1 crop but the P65+ vignettes terriblyVictor
I will be seeing this camera in Manchester UK, tomorrow, so if anyone has any questions, ask and I will get back to you.
Interesting that no-one has mentioned the Sinar M system, which already does this trick (albeit it only with Nikon lenses, not Canon afaik:http://www.sinar.ch/en/products/shutters/177-sinar-m
That's probably because it only works with Sinar backs? The Old Sinarcam also took Nikon and Hasselblad lenses but it was not portable.
Is the lens image circle that vignettes , or the mount? I am sure my Novoflex lenses will be OK. re image circle.
While I agree on the wide side, I would say that most lenses longer than 100mm from Canon are as good as anything else in 35mm
I dont get the point so far.Where is the advantage of using a Hartblei with a Canon T/S lens and decreased T/S movements compared to just using a tech camera with a propper MF lens from Schneider or Rodenstock?
I have seen some pretty good shots with long Canon lenses, esp some here with better beamer in wildlife.However Rod and Schneider make canon wides look like holgas (oops, scratch that, sounds like flaming; how about like a P&S? will that pass? :-)
True, they are not the same. I was just pointing out that using 35mm lenses with a medium format back is far from new.