We all know that the superior image created by FF DSLR would do this with Canon's wide zooms. Why the surprise? I'll deal with it.
Hi Boku,
Without entering the debate as to whether the 5D is a better camera than the D2X, I have to say that the "belief" in the value of FF uber alles, and in opposition with the facts, is getting close to the case Michael described so well in its article about Digital vs film.
A theoretical belief that FF is better is being defended against the facts showing that APS sensors probably have overall the upper hand.
- Today, there is not clear evidence that FF sensors are less noisy even at high ISO. A comparision between the noise of the 20D vs 5D will clarify this (although the 5D being one year younger, a small edge could just result from that),
- There is clear evidence that FF sensors have problems with wide angle lenses,
- APS sized sensors have clear advantages on the long end,
The only 2 things that I can agree with is that FF cameras provide some value for those looking for shallow DOF, and for those who are not willing to invest into digital lenses. Considering that FF cameras are inherently more expensive, I find the second argument rather dubious, but can understand the feeling.
For the rest, I don't see the "superior" image you write about below. If I were a Canon user, I would also have prefered a 12 MP 30D instead of the current FF 5D.
Regards,
Bernard