Hello,
this is my first message at LL. Does anyone have any experience from either of the lenses Rodenstock apo sironar 120 mm or the corresponding Schneider lens, apo digitar 120mm? I will use the lens for still life/table top photography - not in extreme macro mode 2:1 or similiar. I use a technical camera with a 36x49 chip. As I can understand, the Schneider lens is a lot more expensive than the rodenstock. Does it deliver more?
/max
I just spent a lot of time researching macro. Since I was going for extremely high magnification macro I quickly moved past the 120mm, but whilst I had and used it I found that it was unequivocally awesome.
That Schneider 120mm is RAZOR sharp even on a 6 micron sensor like the P65+ provided that you use it in it's recommended range of magnification. It's absolute optimum is 1:1. They state good performance from 1:4-4:1 and they are generally pretty conservative on such claims but this will depend on your personal threshold for what "good" is as well as the type of chip (6/6.8/9 micron sensor).
I'd also suggest if you have further questions that you can call Schneider directly (or call a dealer like us that has a relationship with them). They are very helpful professionals and happy to answer even very technical questions.
http://www.schneideroptics.com/ecommerce/C...03&IID=1928http://www.captureintegration.com/2009/08/25/extreme-macro/This is a fully one-sided set of comments since I have not used the Rodenstock equivalent. I can't address any issues of relative performance or performance-per-dollar - I can only vouch that there is no way you could be disappointed by the quality of the Schneider 120mm.
Doug
Doug Peterson
__________________
Head of Technical Services, Capture Integration
Phase One, Leaf, Canon, Apple, Profoto, Eizo & More
National: 877.217.9870 | Cell: 740.707.2183
Newsletter:
Read Latest or Sign UpRSS Feed:
Subscribe