Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14   Go Down

Author Topic: Leica S2 Pricing  (Read 86676 times)

feppe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Oh this shows up in here!
    • Harri Jahkola Photography
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #120 on: August 01, 2009, 08:20:50 pm »

Quote from: D_Clear
Thanks for taking the time to view my website, I'd appreciate knowing what type of internet and computer speed you are using, I have had wildly differing load-times reported but in our testing, a recent-model computer with high-speed 'lite' typically loads in 30 seconds or less.

30 seconds to load a site is about 27 seconds too slow for most people - I would have closed the window if I didn't see promising-looking thumbnails  That's the main problem with Flash - nice-looking sites but they turn a lot of people away. I presume your target audience is ADs, they're probably used to slowness of Flash sites since most commercial photogs seem to use Flash. I have 4 meg broadband which is mid-level speed.

I wasn't disputing your (or anyone else's) justification for investing such large amounts on gear - it merely doesn't make sense to me, but can definitely see it making perfect sense for a lot of pros. Especially the ability to write the tax off is a huge incentive.

Just as a sidenote, ROI is a pretty blunt tool for evaluating an investment decision, mainly because it doesn't take opportunity cost into account. IOW, whether investing 80-120k on a complete two-body S2 system with unproven tech generates higher income than spending that 80-120k on lighting, tech guy, marketing and/or new studio.

D_Clear

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 40
    • DERMOT CLEARY PHOTOGRAPHER
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #121 on: August 01, 2009, 10:45:43 pm »

I don't sell to most people, if you hold the perception that 30 seconds is 'too long' for a website to load, that is your prerogative, but I encourage you yo be be very careful about any decision which may homogenize your work or your presentatiion, all of the best photographers recognize that what a client pays you for is your aesthetic - which does not end at the photograph, it extends into every aspect of your presentation. I have gotten photography assignments because clients have liked my site design.

I hold the view that as a visual artist it is essential to differentiate, and to some extent to control the viewing experience, I choose to show large images and within the skin of a preloaded flash environment and my work extends across several genres not commonly seen with a single photographer, my clients are Art Directors with high speed connections and large monitors, I am told they and their Art Buyers are happy to wait, beyond this other opinions are really inconsequential, in many cases I am told it loads in 10 seconds or less, and yes the thumbnails are to suggest what waits. I also have an iPhone version which is much more compact.

As a personal view, I feel a photographer has somewhat 'given up' when they drop their image into a 'Livebooks' type site or the like, especially since we have so few available ways to acceptably communicate with the potential client, make the most of every aspect.

ROI was meant in only the most broad sense, don't have the inclination to laboriously explain every nuance, my point was, I think made.

DC
« Last Edit: August 01, 2009, 11:08:36 pm by D_Clear »
Logged
DC

John Camp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2171
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #122 on: August 01, 2009, 11:22:43 pm »

Slightly off-topic, but several people have mentioned tax write-offs for expensive equipment. Understand, however, that in the US, at any rate, in the highest-taxed states, that something like 55% of the cost of a new camera still comes out of the photographer's pocket, if that photographer is in the highest tax bracket. If the photographer is making the average amount quoted above, his tax rate would be 25% or so (possibly lower, depending on other factors), so at least 75% of the cost would come out of his pocket. You deduct the cost from income, not from computed taxes. So you wind up paying what would otherwise be a good chunk of after-tax money for the camera. If you need it badly enough, you do it, but it's not "free," as some people seem to think.

JC
Logged

PeterA

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 124
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #123 on: August 02, 2009, 12:39:59 am »

Judging by what gets posted here by professional shooters - advertising photography is now very much a fusion between original capture and post shot manipulation. The 'look' is everything and the 'look' is definitely becoming more and more graphic. For such purposes - I don't think anyone needs more than a DSLR and a fast FTP service to a post shot retouching service. However - everyone loves new toys and most ( it seems) despise new toys that are too expensive. The S2 is more interesting than anything out there being made by anyone else - at the moment - except for RED. Leica seem to be targeting a modest 1-2000 unit sales target per annum - this is achievable on the basis of ergonomic differentiation alone. Other makers can try and flog a dead horse by continuing with more megapixels and higher ISO -which merely underlines MFD limitations compared to 35mm DSLR rather than reinforce differences.

IF Leica actually prove this niche exists - they may actually create a new market for Canon which needs a new niche to move up into as their FF DSLR is running out of megapixel space. In the meantime - I look forward to true differentiation from RED via their 645/617 chips and video/still fusion.

Logged

eronald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6642
    • My gallery on Instagram
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #124 on: August 02, 2009, 04:18:20 am »

I have used both MF and the Canikons. MF sufers hugely in practice from ISO and focus problems and missing lenses eg. shift.

Leica could have an interestng product if they had a decent fast sensor ; however they might find it more profitable to make a decent Olympus Pen F / M series hybrid  with Leica lenses and a Panasonic sensor and focus system rather than waste their lens designers time on MF.

Edmund
Logged
If you appreciate my blog posts help me by following on https://instagram.com/edmundronald

ziocan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 426
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #125 on: August 02, 2009, 04:35:03 am »

Leica is likely making good profit selling a boat load of lenses for point and shoot and even cellphones now.
they need a flagship product that keep their status high.
they do not necessarily need to to great profits selling the S2, which is probably going to be the best MF solution for 80% of MF photography applications, for a while.
they priced it considering the competition. they are always been much more expensive than the competition. i do not see anything new there.
Logged

eronald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6642
    • My gallery on Instagram
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #126 on: August 02, 2009, 05:35:48 am »

I see somthing new here:

 Many years ago lots of pros had Leicas. Leica Ms were what the company made money on, which is why they sold them.
 I learnt photography on a beaten-up Leica. Many here did the same, I'd bet. Those times are now over. Flagship products - Ha!

 I have gone through 4 M8 bodies - 3 had various failures. That's new too. There was a time when what came out of the Leica factory actually worked, without a necessity for a "platinum service" plan.

Edmund

Quote from: ziocan
Leica is likely making good profit selling a boat load of lenses for point and shoot and even cellphones now.
they need a flagship product that keep their status high.
they do not necessarily need to to great profits selling the S2, which is probably going to be the best MF solution for 80% of MF photography applications, for a while.
they priced it considering the competition. they are always been much more expensive than the competition. i do not see anything new there.
Logged
If you appreciate my blog posts help me by following on https://instagram.com/edmundronald

dfarkas

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 123
    • http://www.leicastoremiami.com
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #127 on: August 02, 2009, 01:08:14 pm »

Sorry for my lack of input and involvement in this thread since posting prices in the wee hours of Thrusday morning. The reasons for my absence are twofold:

1) I have been extremely busy during the last few days. I spent all of Thursday, Friday, and Saturday touching base with my S2 pre-order list. I just haven't had the time to read everything or post. In fact, I've only been able to get through 2/3rds of my list.

2) Even if I did have the time, many are so entrenched in their viewpoints that little or nothing I might have said would really matter. My input would be conveniently dismissed as "marketing hype" or "bs" or whatever.

That being said, I'm sure some here are interested to know how my conversations over the last few days have gone. Maybe I live in a bubble, but my reality has not coincided with what is happening online. Of all my pre-orders, no one was insulted, offended, shocked, etc. by the S2 pricing. In fact, no one backed out or cancelled due to price. All those that were interested in getting an S2, are still excited to get one in October. There are a couple who will wait for the 30-90 to be available. Everyone wants to see final specs (within a week or two) and see real images, just as I do. But, the price was expected. Part of this was due to my comminicating a realistic price for last 6-9 months in all my conversations. I told anyone who asked that the price would be about $20K for the body and about $4-6K for the lenses. I've seen the Euro go from about $1.25 to the current $1.43. Leica told me that at anything above $1.35, they'd have to adjust pricing. So, the 10-15% higher price for the body was somewhat expected.

Leica has clearly stated that fashion, beauty, advertising, and commercial are the main target markets, as well as advanced amateurs who want the best balance of ease, handling, and image quailty. In reviewing my list, I'd say that Leica has so far done a good job, as I have representation from all of these specialties, as well as high-end professional landscape photographers (those shooting for coffee-table books and grand-format commercial prints sold through galleries and/or corporate decorators).

There appears to be some confusion over the warranty and add-on service packages. To clarify, the body and lenses come with a standard 12-month warranty (same as a Phase Classic warranty or standard Hasselblad warranty). The service packages are optional add-ons just like Hassy's Camera Care Plan or Phase's Value Added Warranty, which also cost several thousand $$.

The Premium Service Package includes:
- Extra year of transferable warranty
- Camera swap service during the first three months (no repairs, just a new camera the next day)
- Special phone hotline with dedicated S2 specialist
- guaranteed spare parts availibility for 6 years
- 30% discount on non-warranty repairs (ex. dropping camera)

The Platinum Service Package includes:
(same as above), plus...
- free of charge maintenance including one shutter and/or central shutter replacement (doesn't have to be broken)
- free of charge loaner service during repairs

Keep in mind, also, that customers who purchase from me can get loaners or rentals from me at no charge regardless of service level, and can reach me 24/7 for help and support. That is just being a good dealer, rather than a box mover. I'd say that the Premium package is plenty for most individual shooters. The Platinum is geared more towards rental studios and busy top-tier professionals. $495 for lenses and $1,495 for the body isn't really that unreasonable for the Premium option.

Yes, Lightroom will come bundled with the camera. There will also be tethering software that can control all functions of the camera, including camera focus, all settings, etc. The application doesn't do RAW conversion, but rather controls the camera and deposits images in whatever folder you choose. Hot-folder-capable applications like LR, Aperture, or even C1 can be used - this is the user's choice.

As to why Leica didn't bundle the 70mm with the camera, you might be interested to learn that only about 50% of my customers chose to order the 70mm with the camera. The fact is that everyone is different. How would you feel about being required to buy an M8.2 with a 35mm Summicron? Sure, a certain percentage would like it (like me), but most would prefer to pick their own lens package. Same with the S2.

Regarding switching from other systems, I have taken trade-ins on two H3DII-39s, one H3DII-31, one H3DII-50, a D3x, and many other assorted items. Other customers have already sold H3DII-39 systems, at least one P45+, and Canon/Nikon systems to fund the S2. So, obviously, for these folks, there is enough reason to switch platforms.

The reality is that we will see final specs within the next week or two and images before camera availibility. Of course, no one wants to drop $30K on a system without seeing images. But, most know what to expect:

- Lenses without compromise that can be shot at any aperture (not just f/11)
- The smallest, lightest, fastest MF system and the only one with weather sealing in a fully modern body
- 1/500th of a sec flash sync with CS lenses and 1/400th of a sec max shutter with FP shutter (easy as flipping a switch)
- Large, bright, hi-res LCD
- Accurate AF (that doesn't require a 3x loupe)
- Minimal mirror slap

If you've handled the S2 for any amount of time and have experience with other MF systems, you can immediately tell a difference. Since switching to SSDs in my new laptop, I can't ever imaging going back to a platter-based HDD. It would be painful. Likewise, I think that once photographers start using the S2 they will have a very difficult time going back to other systems. Maybe they get the job done, but not as smoothly and seamlessly as they might with the S2.

As some here have said, if the IQ is there (in addition to the ergos), the camera will indeed sell. And, sell very well at that. Leica's imminent demise is grossly overstated.

I am not trying to "sell" you guys on the S2. I honestly think that the camera has done a great job of selling itself already. It is not for everyone, just as a $40K P65+ isn't for everyone, or an $11K Profoto Pro-8a power pack, or an $11K Profoto 10' Para Umbrella, etc. I know that many would like to have a chance to use the S2, and would like the price to be under $15K. I'd like a Porsche Cayman S to be the same price as an Accord, but I doubt going on a Porsche forum and convincing everyone there that the Cayman should sell for $25K is going to change anything. A Porsche is a Porsche and priced as such. Likewise, the S2 offers a certain value proposition to photographers and is also priced accordingly.

David
Logged
David Farkas
Leica Store Miami
www.leicastoremiami.com

Check out Red Dot Forum for Leica news, reviews, blogs and discussion

rainer_v

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1194
    • http://www.tangential.de
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #128 on: August 02, 2009, 01:31:50 pm »

double post ... see below.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2009, 01:53:04 pm by rainer_v »
Logged
rainer viertlböck
architecture photograp

gwhitf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 855
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #129 on: August 02, 2009, 01:40:31 pm »

Quote from: dfarkas
Of course, no one wants to drop $30K on a system without seeing images.

Either I can't run a Calculator, or you have a very interesting definition of a "system" for a professional photographer.

One lens, one body, and maybe a warranty? Is that all it takes?
« Last Edit: August 02, 2009, 02:45:36 pm by gwhitf »
Logged

tho_mas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1799
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #130 on: August 02, 2009, 01:43:33 pm »

Quote from: dfarkas
Regarding switching from other systems, I have taken trade-ins on two H3DII-39s, one H3DII-31, one H3DII-50, a D3x, and many other assorted items. Other customers have already sold H3DII-39 systems, at least one P45+, and Canon/Nikon systems to fund the S2. So, obviously, for these folks, there is enough reason to switch platforms.
The "reason enough" here is the red dot. they didn't handle the camera, couldn't test the entire workflow, didn't see images... however they are dropping their gear for something they don't know... other than it is Leica. LEICA.
Well, if the Leica myth is still strong enough maybe the camera will be a successor... in these target groups. And why not. Would be a pity to lose the next traditional camera maker (though I think this will be Leica's fate).

Quote from: dfarkas
- Accurate AF (that doesn't require a 3x loupe)
 
Logged

rainer_v

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1194
    • http://www.tangential.de
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #131 on: August 02, 2009, 01:51:46 pm »

david,
believe it or not but i will not buy the s2 because a lack of money but because a lack of need for me.
so even if you would present it to me i would not see to use it. believe it or not.

and i write because i started as edmund with a m4p shooting and used many years a r8 for details aside 4x5".
i am a bit sad thinking that the s2 move could be a big mistake for leica and probably the last one,
i would like to see leica longer in this business. maybe i am wrong seeing so dark. we will see it soon.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2009, 01:52:18 pm by rainer_v »
Logged
rainer viertlböck
architecture photograp

tho_mas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1799
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #132 on: August 02, 2009, 01:59:08 pm »

Quote from: rainer_v
so even if you would present it to me i would not see to use it. believe it or not.
of course you wouldn't. It's a DSLR. Maybe the best DSLR ever made... the super DSLR.
With super few features (starting with the lack of Live View...)
« Last Edit: August 02, 2009, 01:59:30 pm by tho_mas »
Logged

bcooter

  • Guest
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #133 on: August 02, 2009, 02:07:22 pm »

Quote from: tho_mas
of course you wouldn't. It's a DSLR. Maybe the best DSLR ever made... the super DSLR.
With super few features (starting with the lack of Live View...)

Oh boy.

I'm getting back in the sticker business, heck I'll even become a camera maker.

I'll buy a bunch of Canon 1ds3's and putty up the Canon logo, re-stamp the word Leicas (notice I made it plural to avoid trademark problems) and make the Red dot kind of orange.

I'll sell those Canons for $15,000 and call it the Porsche Cayman of cameras but (now here's the big one), my new Leicas will have have live view, multipoint autofocus, high iso, a dozen lenses and software that tethers without a kludged up workaround for photographers that demand only the VERY best.  

My new Titanium Service will give the users a new Leicas FivesDeesToos that also shoots video, just for $6,000.

Now all semi kidding aside, let's be honest about this.  If the price wasn't an issue, pdn wouldn't have that screwy press release with the smiley guy justifying the price.

Actually I don't think the price is that bad for a medium format camera, I just think the whole thought of 50 grand for a stills only system doesn't make sense today.  

The people at RED (the new red dot that gets attention) are probably working 20 hour days and buying up empty warehouses to store the boat loads of  money they know that is coming their way.

Logged

Franzl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #134 on: August 02, 2009, 02:12:40 pm »

alright, it took me some time to register to finally put in my opinion...maybe I am getting something wrong, but I don't feel that the S2 is super expensive, at least for central Europe...a new H3DII39 cost about 17000 € without tax, the S2 will cost around 18000 inkl. tax...thats 15k...almost the price of the H3DII31...the lenses are def. expensive, but rather have the S2 lenses, which are rugged and solid than Hasselblad Fuji lenses which feel like "crap" compared to old hasselblad lenses...also the argument, that other systems are flexible doesn't count for me...as far as I know, you need to get a new body with each Hasselblad back, as there are some small changes with every back...and I just don't use large format cams, where I would like to snap a digital back on...

PhaseOne and the Phase/Mamiya cam, just isn't a option, due the lack of central shutter lenses... and for me I am only using 2 lenses at the moment...24-70mm from canon and the 135mm (all the others are just in the camera bag all the time)...so I wouldn't need too many lenses...and lenses are a good investment, as those life most times longer than the back...and I would rather invest in solid lenses, than in Hasselblad or Phamiya lenses...

if I would get a DMF System right now it would be Hasselblad or Leica...but on the other hand I really don't like Phocus and I love LR, which is awesome that Leica is working together with Adobe...PhaseOne on the other hand got a really good software solution...but there isn't just a cam outthere I would like to snap a back on...

don't know at the moment I am kind of happy with my Canon System, but I wanna buy a DMF next year or so...the only thing I don't like at Canon is the 3:2 format, which is the same on the S2 again...but we'll see what Canon gonna bring out in the next time...for me 37MP are really fine, more MP just doesn't make sense all the time...

but I also think, that some photographers need to use DMF as it is a certain standard like it is in the advertising industry...and those photographers I know use DMF kind of often, so I cannot really sign the "DMF propably gonna die in the next years" comment...

alright, sorry for this little confusing comment and wanna know what you guys think about it...

Logged

Streetshooter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #135 on: August 02, 2009, 02:18:52 pm »

Quote from: gwhitf
Either I can't run a Calculator, or you have a very interesting definition for a "system" for a professional photographer.

One lens, one body, and maybe a warranty? Is that all it takes?


Two bodies, at least three/four lenses. Plus warranty, how much does that little lot come to then ?

Anybody embarking on a shoot without backups will be taking one hell of a risk.  Now what can I sell........... maybe the wife.

Pete
Logged

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #136 on: August 02, 2009, 02:31:57 pm »

Quote from: Franzl
but I also think, that some photographers need to use DMF as it is a certain standard like it is in the advertising industry...and those photographers I know use DMF kind of often, so I cannot really sign the "DMF propably gonna die in the next years" comment...

There is no standard of equipment for advertising.  Everything is driven by expediency.  The only requirements are a nice file and tetherability.  For commerce:  Products and architecture need a medium format back, mainly for use with view cameras.  Depending on the client, beauty benefits from MF Digital, but everything else can be shot with with an old 1ds.  No client cares what you shoot, not anymore.  What they care about is your product and what you bring to the table, how well you partner with them.  That is it.  



Logged

yaya

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1254
    • http://yayapro.com
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #137 on: August 02, 2009, 02:37:42 pm »

Quote from: dfarkas
Leica has clearly stated that fashion, beauty, advertising, and commercial are the main target markets, as well as advanced amateurs who want the best balance of ease, handling, and image quailty. In reviewing my list, I'd say that Leica has so far done a good job, as I have representation from all of these specialties, as well as high-end professional landscape photographers (those shooting for coffee-table books and grand-format commercial prints sold through galleries and/or corporate decorators).

Yes, Lightroom will come bundled with the camera. There will also be tethering software that can control all functions of the camera, including camera focus, all settings, etc. The application doesn't do RAW conversion, but rather controls the camera and deposits images in whatever folder you choose. Hot-folder-capable applications like LR, Aperture, or even C1 can be used - this is the user's choice.

Regarding switching from other systems, I have taken trade-ins on two H3DII-39s, one H3DII-31, one H3DII-50, a D3x, and many other assorted items. Other customers have already sold H3DII-39 systems, at least one P45+, and Canon/Nikon systems to fund the S2. So, obviously, for these folks, there is enough reason to switch platforms.

David, has any of these people questioned you regarding tethered workflow functions and performance, such as press-to-preview time, buffer performance, overlay/ layout/ grid facility and system requirements (PC/ Mac/ USB/ FW etc.) or are they eager enough to throw their proven+working solutions without caring about what the replacement is like?

Quote
The reality is that we will see final specs within the next week or two and images before camera availibility. Of course, no one wants to drop $30K on a system without seeing images. But, most know what to expect:

- Lenses without compromise that can be shot at any aperture (not just f/11)
- The smallest, lightest, fastest MF system and the only one with weather sealing in a fully modern body
- 1/500th of a sec flash sync with CS lenses and 1/400th of a sec max shutter with FP shutter (easy as flipping a switch)
- Large, bright, hi-res LCD
- Accurate AF (that doesn't require a 3x loupe)
- Minimal mirror slap

- I agree with gwhitf on the definition of a "system" - I know very few people who buy a new MF camera with less than 2-3 lenses. Let's not forget that lenses for current MF cameras can be found 2nd hand and in many places are available in rental.
- Lightest? Has anyone actually weighed a working production unit with 3 lenses and compared it to an equivalent Mamiya AFDII/ III?
- Any reason why the CS lenses don't go beyond 1/500, knowing that the shutters are smaller than those made for other 645/ 6X6 cameras?
- Good LCD is useless if the preview shown on it is not good. I am not saying the one on the S2 is not good but it's not proven
- AF performance: again this will have to be tested against the H system
- Mirror slap: needs to be proven in files...

As I represent no one but myself here, I am just questioning the real target market for this new system. Time will tell I guess.


Logged
Yair Shahar | Product Manager | Phase One - Cultural Heritage
e: ysh@phaseone.com |

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #138 on: August 02, 2009, 03:06:39 pm »

Quote from: yaya
As I represent no one but myself here, I am just questioning the real target market for this new system. Time will tell I guess.

People w/o a workflow, people who only need one body because they don't shoot much, people who demand "The Best", people with $30k to burn even in hard times.  Safari hats, Billingham bags, (not ironic) moustaches.  






Logged

Franzl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
Leica S2 Pricing
« Reply #139 on: August 02, 2009, 03:15:33 pm »

for my part, I rather have a different system with me as backup...what happens, when somethings happens to the photocase...if some lenses are destroyed, what does a second body helps...a 5DII with 2 lenses will resecue almost any job...

and for I can tell you from my expierence, that art directors care which system you are using...customers also do...not often, but from time to time...

the extra service is a joke if you ask me...and I wouldn't by 2 S2 bodies...don't know what for...just gonna keep my canon system as backup...
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14   Go Up