http://old.photodo.com/prod/lens/minolta.shtml#MinoltaA good quick list. The 100mm seems to be among the best. Old Maxxum lenses are literally everywhere as well.
I'm not concerned about it, really, since there is the decade or two long list of Maxxum lenses out there as well that will fit the Sonys.
Getting back to another topic...
http://www.mhohner.de/sony-minolta/lenses.phpLet's compare to the larget list including 35mm lenses that will work.
Sony 500/4: none available !There ARE a couple of 600/4s avaialble, used, though. Plus, a 300/4 and a 400/4.5 Close enough I say.(there also are two 500/8 models as well)
Sony 300/2.8: 6672€
Nikon 300/2.8: 4999€Minolta AF 300/2.8 APO G (D) SSM (same thing, older manufacture): $4459 at B&H Photo(average price, used) Now, true, the Nikon is new, but if you HAVE to have such an expensive and dedicated lens, cost isn't a huge issue.
Sony 100/2.8 macro 822€
Nikon 105/2.8 VR Micro 799€$589 at Amazon here in the U.S. Less, used, of course. Both are excellent lenses, though - $23€ isn't a factor, really.
Sony 180 or 200mm f/2.8 prime - none available!But there is a nice 70-200 2.8... Yes, there is a 150-200mm or so gap, but Canon also has a few gaps.
Sony 50/1.4 389€ (screwdriver AF)
Nikon 50/1.4D 299€ (same; AF-S version a bit more expensive)The identical Minolta lens from about a decade ago is a TAD(loads) less used, though... If we're talking used Maxxum lenses, it gets really cheap to fit an A900. That's the big deal here. full-frame and can finally use all of the older lenses again at no multiplier. Suddenly it IS a full pro platform again. And don't tell me real pros don't buy or know about used lenses, either.
Sony 35/1.4 was not found in the lists of the store
Nikon 35/2 350€There is one, but it's a Zeiss lens and pricey. Okay, you got us there. So far, though, I fail to see any huge gaps.
Sony Zeiss 16-35/2.8 1648€
Nikon 14-24/2.8 1599€Percentage-wise, not a real factor.
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/results.asp?IDLensType=1Oh wait - things got murkier when you add in the other manufacturers...
http://kievcamera.net/catalog/product_info...products_id=19135mm minolta mount t/s lens. $600 (manual focus in a t/s macro lens isn't
a detraction in my mind)
http://kievcamera.net/catalog/product_info...products_id=19080mm for $340.
Like these two lenses. Though, to be fair, these two lenses do work with Nikon and Canon as well.
Full frame and backwards compatible with Maxxum lenses gives the A900 a proper place in pro photography again. That's why everyone's happy about the Sony. It used to be that Sony was kind of like the Olympus. Kludgy and barely compatible. It left the older users out of the game, so many sold their gear and moved elsewhere.
Now it's good again. 28mm is 28mm. Sensor is finally large enough. Loads of cheap glass is everywhere. And it's price-competitive. Is it better than a Canon or Nikon? I don't know. But it's surely not junk, either.