has been use my Mamiya AFD for a while , now thinking of getting a AFD II or III ,
is there any major different btw AFD I , II , III ?
please advise , wish you guys a happy holidays
S.
"Major" is something you'd have to decide holding each in your hand. Do you have a dealer nearby? Most should have at least one AFD II and AFD III to compare to your AFD.
As you've probably figured out the AFD III is also sold as the Phase One 645. These are the same cameras, but the Phase One 645 can be purchased with a 3 year 300,000 shutter count warranty.
However, the focus of improvements are:
- faster AF
- more accurate AF (especially in low light)
- reduced shutter lag
- reduced black out time
The AFD had only one firmware version.
The AFD II had two firmware versions.
The AFD III is currently on 1.4 firmware and will see future firmware updates. The 1.4 firmware has reduced the shutter lag considerably.
There are dozens of small improvements other than those and I will list some below, but the above reasons would generally be why you would upgrade.
- AFD III mirror lock-up is electronic controlled
- AFD III has three focus points (though they are very close together)
- metering consistency and sophistication is improved
- ergonomics of AFD III are "improved". In our experience most users do prefer the newer bodies, but ergonomics are highly personal, so judge for yourself
- AFD III has a higher possible frame rate, though so far only the P65+ would be slowed down by an AFD or AFD II body.
- other arguably minor changes in button design and positions, most of our customers are either happy or indifferent to these changes
Finally the AFD III / Phase One 645 are slated to be compatible with the leaf shutter lenses Mamiya is currently developing, and will be the only body with shutter-speed/aperture control when combined with the P65+ and future Phase One backs.
Doug Peterson, Head of Technical Services
Capture Integration, Phase One & Canon Dealer |
Personal Portfolio