Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 5DII RAW files  (Read 4585 times)

marcmccalmont

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1774
5DII RAW files
« on: November 29, 2008, 07:20:53 pm »

Nothing special, just took a few handheld shots this morning so I could post some raw files for those that are interested
Marc

https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?acti...39486aacf6aa1b5
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?acti...2a51507c67a29a1
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?acti...53f5f9d2db42066
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?acti...54290adfa925b4b
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?acti...f8d47fc372515d4
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?acti...7f3623c4579c6fd

[attachment=10001:_MG_0024_1.jpg]
The shadows look clean, looks like the MkII has an additional stop of DR over the original
« Last Edit: November 29, 2008, 08:43:40 pm by marcmccalmont »
Logged
Marc McCalmont

DarkPenguin

  • Guest
5DII RAW files
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2008, 08:54:18 pm »

Lots of moire.  Otherwise looks pretty clean.
Logged

marcmccalmont

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1774
5DII RAW files
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2008, 09:23:54 pm »

Quote from: DarkPenguin
Lots of moire.  Otherwise looks pretty clean.

based on the raws or the jpeg? the jpeg is pretty awful but gets better if you press + over the image.
Logged
Marc McCalmont

DarkPenguin

  • Guest
5DII RAW files
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2008, 09:57:49 pm »

I only grabbed the first 3.  Processed one in ACR 5.2.  0036, I think.
Logged

John MacLean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 169
    • John MacLean Photography
5DII RAW files
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2008, 02:39:06 am »

Yes #36 has moire and is easily showing extinction resolution in the vents at 200%. This would be quite obvious on a larger print.
Logged

Panopeeper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1805
5DII RAW files
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2008, 03:14:15 pm »

Marc,

your 5D2 beats your 5D by at least 1/2 EV in the darkest regions @ ISO 100 (I used one of your earlier posted 5D raw files). This is on a per pixel basis, add the extra pixels!

Do you still have the color checker card? If you make a serie of raw shots with each ISO, up to 3200 (save the higher ones, they are fake), very evenly lit, 3 EV underexposed, then I can measure and compare their noise/DR behaviour. IIRC, you had converted the 5D in IR, right? That does not matter, the noise characteristics is not affected by that.
Logged
Gabor

marcmccalmont

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1774
5DII RAW files
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2008, 04:58:56 pm »

Quote from: Panopeeper
Marc,

your 5D2 beats your 5D by at least 1/2 EV in the darkest regions @ ISO 100 (I used one of your earlier posted 5D raw files). This is on a per pixel basis, add the extra pixels!

Do you still have the color checker card? If you make a serie of raw shots with each ISO, up to 3200 (save the higher ones, they are fake), very evenly lit, 3 EV underexposed, then I can measure and compare their noise/DR behaviour. IIRC, you had converted the 5D in IR, right? That does not matter, the noise characteristics is not affected by that.

Gabor
Yes I would but I am in Tokyo for 4 months of training so I don't have access to my color checker. (lucky though here I picked up the 5DII on the 29th in the US they are taking orders for April!) I will return home the second week of January but by then I'm sure all the reviews will be out. I sold the 5D maxmax (AA removed not IR) to help fund the 5DII so I cannot do a side by side comparison. My first impressions though are the shadows are much less noisy and usable. Also the fine detail like foliage is more realistic. When I return home I'll take the pictures of the color checker and post them. I think the sensor is in the same league as the 1DsIII so for $2800 I'm happy (for another 3 years!)
Marc
« Last Edit: November 30, 2008, 05:00:05 pm by marcmccalmont »
Logged
Marc McCalmont
Pages: [1]   Go Up