Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 214   Go Down

Author Topic: Recent Professional Works  (Read 1781199 times)

tho_mas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1799
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #820 on: May 20, 2009, 06:07:25 pm »

Quote from: carstenw
Thomas, interesting points, but at least points 2 and 3 don't explain why James *sometimes* sees the difference, and sometimes not.
Maybe I get the question wrong but my reading was that he was referring to the same image - so the preview in C1 and the view of the same image processed and opened in Photoshop.
"Sometimes" depend on the luminance level of the images or whether there are dominant dark areas or not (I'd assume).
I forgot point #4: you have to zoom in to at least 25% viewing size. Smaller sizes are lowres and you don't get a picture of the real contrast and density.
This is how it looks like here (C1 on the left, PS on the right):
[attachment=13837:screenC1_PSCS4.jpg]
(for a preview I find this really good to work with)


edit: as to the "sometimes" question here are some nice examples:

http://web.mit.edu/persci/gaz/gaz-teaching/index.html
http://www.johnsadowski.com/big_spanish_castle.php
http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/index.html
« Last Edit: May 20, 2009, 07:37:08 pm by tho_mas »
Logged

Professional

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 309
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #821 on: May 20, 2009, 08:20:26 pm »

James, i like your photos, but i was thinking that this thread is for only MF shots, we have 35 DSLR, but as long it is in Medium Format then i think we want to see only MF shots regardless of how perfect are those 35mm DSLR shots can be, we know you or many here are pro enough to do wonders even with P&S, but there is another thread for DSLRs rather than MF, i have 1Ds3 and 1Ds2 and 5D, but i will post here only MF shots if i will have something great shots anyway by my H3D2-39, but i am sure many members here will say that they don't care to see any great shots [high quality pro] from any camera here.
Logged

Professional

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 309
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #822 on: May 20, 2009, 08:24:37 pm »

And i am not saying to post 2 shots from 35mm DSLR and MF and ask people if they can define which from which body, we are not looking for making comparisons between bodies here, it is just to keep the thread for one type of cameras [or level] in here, why not posting large format shots then? why not P&S if we can have stunning pro shots by them? i will not got into challenge to see how great those entry-level and P&S are capable of producing against MF, I just hope members keep this thread with pure MF shots.

Sorry if this is annoying or rude, but it is my opinion.
Logged

mcfoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 940
    • http://montalbetticampbell.com
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #823 on: May 20, 2009, 08:43:30 pm »

Quote from: James R Russell
[attachment=13793:smfinalf...408_copy.jpg]



JRR

Very nice work!
Denis
Logged
Denis Montalbetti
Montalbetti+Campbell [

tho_mas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1799
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #824 on: May 20, 2009, 08:44:26 pm »

Quote from: Professional
I just hope members keep this thread with pure MF shots.
That's a valid standpoint. You take the device as premise.
But there is another standpoint that is valid as well: history as premise.
James comes from MF an now switchted (mainly) to 35mm. (Actually I don't know at all where he comes from... probably from all the formats).
He uses the 35mm for the same purposes he used MF before.
And - more important - he'd like to share his images with the people that are active in this forum (historically).
And the people that are active in this forum are very pleased that James shares his image here - I bet!
Isn't it the content, the subject and the context that matters?
« Last Edit: May 20, 2009, 08:45:35 pm by tho_mas »
Logged

Professional

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 309
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #825 on: May 20, 2009, 10:32:29 pm »

Quote from: tho_mas
That's a valid standpoint. You take the device as premise.
But there is another standpoint that is valid as well: history as premise.
James comes from MF an now switchted (mainly) to 35mm. (Actually I don't know at all where he comes from... probably from all the formats).
He uses the 35mm for the same purposes he used MF before.
And - more important - he'd like to share his images with the people that are active in this forum (historically).
And the people that are active in this forum are very pleased that James shares his image here - I bet!
Isn't it the content, the subject and the context that matters?

Yes, i agree, but isn't there another thread for those 35mm shots? also great pro shots there, or is that 35mm there is for non pro?
Logged

ddk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 274
    • http://www.pbase.com/ddk
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #826 on: May 20, 2009, 11:19:17 pm »

Quote from: Professional
Yes, i agree, but isn't there another thread for those 35mm shots? also great pro shots there, or is that 35mm there is for non pro?


Please, the central theme of this thread seems to be processing rather than any camera or format, honestly, look at any of the fashion shots here and tell me that's how the raw file looks. The camera is completely moot at this level, just look at James' images, they're fantastic and I have never seen anything looking like that from my Canons or Nikons for that matter but now I know what's possible. Let it go...
Logged
david
-----------------------
www.pbase.com/ddk

Frank Doorhof

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1522
    • http://
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #827 on: May 21, 2009, 03:15:01 am »

If I may add.
I'm mostly only active in this board, so when I shoot something with the 5DMKII I would love to share it in this board, because it's were I hang arround most of the times.
For me this board is as mentioned in another board the "Pro" board and I would love it if it stays that way.

As James mentioned many times before it's not the camera that will give you the shot, it's the photographer.
And to be honest I would just love to see beautiful work by pros instead of policing the board by minor details

I very much enjoy looking at this thread and see it as the PRO share your shots thread if you own a MF back, but hey that's me


And to add something :
two different tonings (experiments) of the same setup.
Shot a few weeks ago with the 5DMKII, I shoot 99.9% of the model work with the Leaf, but this was simply impossible due to the high ISO needed, for me it would be weird to upload these in another section of the forum where I normaly don't hang out.....
Or not ?

I think we should be more on sharing and respecting/enjoying each others work than in trying to make the board go down or scaring people away.

The MF crowd might be small with little options to hang out online without being overwashed with DSLR user who claim that MF is dead, let's keep this place a nice hangout and share our shots
« Last Edit: May 21, 2009, 03:15:46 am by Frank Doorhof »
Logged

James R Russell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 992
    • http://www.russellrutherford.com/
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #828 on: May 21, 2009, 03:30:58 am »

Recent Professional Work

[attachment=13850:professi...otograph.jpg]


JRR
Logged

Frank Doorhof

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1522
    • http://
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #829 on: May 21, 2009, 04:21:18 am »

Great James, love the small droplets and reflection.
Logged

jing q

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 596
    • we are super
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #830 on: May 21, 2009, 04:23:50 am »

Quote from: Frank Doorhof
If I may add.
I'm mostly only active in this board, so when I shoot something with the 5DMKII I would love to share it in this board, because it's were I hang arround most of the times.
For me this board is as mentioned in another board the "Pro" board and I would love it if it stays that way.

5D MkII FTW!!!!
recent campaign

Logged

jing q

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 596
    • we are super
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #831 on: May 21, 2009, 04:38:22 am »

Quote from: Frank Doorhof
If I may add.
I'm mostly only active in this board, so when I shoot something with the 5DMKII I would love to share it in this board, because it's were I hang arround most of the times.
For me this board is as mentioned in another board the "Pro" board and I would love it if it stays that way.

5D MkII FTW!!!!
recent campaign
« Last Edit: May 21, 2009, 04:42:31 am by jing q »
Logged

wollom

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #832 on: May 21, 2009, 05:40:49 am »

Quote from: James R Russell
Recent Professional Work

[attachment=13850:professi...otograph.jpg]


JRR

I'm curious to know how much of we are seeing that can be attributed to good lighting/styling/photography/post-processing in this series.  For me part of what makes these shots work well is a coherence in the colour, light and composition.  The first shot (with the torn red couch) has plausibly mixed lighting, but is kind of warm.  The second (with dogs) works for me with the cool tones, "slutty"–can I say that?–pose and those steely 'blown' highlights.  The last, above, looks like there was a lot of work done to balance the light inside and out, and perhaps a cyan layer added in post to key into the lapels of the jacket; for me this pose is the most convincing given that I'd guess showing the clothes was an important factor in posing.  James?  Want to deconstruct these a little for us?  Was it a crew of thousands, a post-processing whiz,...?

Cheers

Wollom
Logged

Dustbak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2442
    • Pepperanddust
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #833 on: May 21, 2009, 06:10:25 am »

Quote from: jing q
5D MkII FTW!!!!
recent campaign



Nice! What is with the fuss about 35mm images? I thought this thread was for images you are proud of regardless of format! When they are all like these or like the ones James & Frank posted, keep them coming I would say
Logged

Professional

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 309
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #834 on: May 21, 2009, 07:57:58 am »

Logged

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #835 on: May 21, 2009, 08:07:43 am »

Quote from: James R Russell
Recent Professional Work

[attachment=13850:professi...otograph.jpg]


JRR

Nice.  New Orleans?
Logged

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #836 on: May 21, 2009, 08:43:56 am »

Quote from: James R Russell
Not to take this off subject, but . . .

Texas' largest export is cotton, though the oil revenue does keep state income tax away and compared to LA, NY, the income tax makes owning here virtually free.

It's not perfect and I don't live here all the time, though the more time we spend here the more we like it, though I've found as along as we're making a living and shooting what we like we're usually happy.

Dallas shows some signs of the recession, but nothing like the coasts and maybe the money was allocated a long time ago, but they building that is going on in and around the downtown area is pretty amazing.

As far as living in a place, I've lived most everywhere and it takes three years to get use to a new place, at least for me.   I was born in Texas but hadn't put a  foot here in 15 years when I bought this building, but I was tired of the tax man and landlord eating my life savings, so there you go.

It's funny, there is perception and reality and usually both don't coexist well.  This business has always been about perception, until times get tough then reality takes over.  

I run into people here from LA all the time now and some moved here way before I invested.   I know models, makeup artists that were on the verge of starving in LA, that now live in 3,400 sq ft. homes and work every week, almost every day in Dallas.

That surprised me.

JRR

I can't live in NYC anymore.  I love it but in so many ways but its time has passed.  As I get older, I'm 36, I just don't have patience for the bull.  The big bites of real estate and taxes introduces income insecurity.  I was OK with this before we had kids, now it keeps me up at night.  Brooklyn Friends is $21k a year for elementary, $16k for Kindergarten.  This is about average.  Packer is about the same.  My wife was an MUA but now stays home with the kids, so its all on me.  Not enough room in our condo, either.  I'm making more money now that I'm mainly working in film, but in the long run it not enough.  

So I bought a large historic house in Richmond VA, where good private schools are cheap, cheap 50 minute flights to NYC leave 3 times a day, Winter isn't debilitating, and its CHEAP.  Keeping the Condo in NYC to work out of. I was going to rent it out but the perception of being based in a 1 or a 9 zip is powerful.  In fact, I have a client I shoot for a few times a year, the Martin Agency.  They are based in Richmond, VA.  I asked them if they ever hire Richmond photographers.  Nope, they don't even look unless they see someone they like in an art show.   I was surprised to see how many ad agencies are in Richmond, and the number of Fortune 500's.  

JR, I was just in WACO yesterday location scouting.  Its like the 80's never ended.
Logged

James R Russell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 992
    • http://www.russellrutherford.com/
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #837 on: May 21, 2009, 12:55:13 pm »

Quote from: TMARK
I can't live in NYC anymore.  I love it but in so many ways but its time has passed.  As I get older, I'm 36, I just don't have patience for the bull.  The big bites of real estate and taxes introduces income insecurity.  I was OK with this before we had kids, now it keeps me up at night.  Brooklyn Friends is $21k a year for elementary, $16k for Kindergarten.  This is about average.  Packer is about the same.  My wife was an MUA but now stays home with the kids, so its all on me.  Not enough room in our condo, either.  I'm making more money now that I'm mainly working in film, but in the long run it not enough.  

So I bought a large historic house in Richmond VA, where good private schools are cheap, cheap 50 minute flights to NYC leave 3 times a day, Winter isn't debilitating, and its CHEAP.  Keeping the Condo in NYC to work out of. I was going to rent it out but the perception of being based in a 1 or a 9 zip is powerful.  In fact, I have a client I shoot for a few times a year, the Martin Agency.  They are based in Richmond, VA.  I asked them if they ever hire Richmond photographers.  Nope, they don't even look unless they see someone they like in an art show.   I was surprised to see how many ad agencies are in Richmond, and the number of Fortune 500's.  

JR, I was just in WACO yesterday location scouting.  Its like the 80's never ended.


Zipcodeitius;   A disease for the easily impressed.  (See alternate definition Smoke and Mirrors).

Symptoms;  Live in small places, pay high taxes, receive minimal city services.  Everything costs double and takes twice the time.  The effected tend to do a lot of one hand clapping and going to industry parties if there are free drinks.

If not treated Zipcodeitius progresses to Brokeonyourassitus, or worse, Mustliveinhugecrowditus with the complication of Takethefilthysubwaytoworkitius.    Zipcodeitius is especially prevelant in 20 to 28 year old's and usually results in Emptytrustfunditius.

Cure;  No known cure, though treatments include moving from 1 or 9, usually due to a financial recession.

The dirty little secret about NY is if you removed the out of state money from the two major institutions, finance and advertising, rent would be $400 a month.

Sure a million ad agencies are up and down Madison Ave, but these million ad agencies probably only work for 3 NY based clients.

There are 10,000 manufacturer offices in Manhattan (actually more, though the numbers are dropping fast), but they are usually just offices with logos, point of sale posters, one receptionist and the rest of the real business is handled in the middle of the country.

Believe it or not you don't have to live in NY to be a good photographer or make a good living, though you do have to know how to maneuver there when needed then get on a plane and leave.

Recently it's been more cost and time effective to move a few key crew members and talent to someplace other than NY which is not a big leap because the last time I counted the crew on a set only myself and my producer lived in Manhattan.  Most of the crew and talent lived so far off the Island in New Jersey, Queens, Brooklyn and Philadelphia, they might as well have been in Richmond.

The few people that do get treatment for Zipcodeitius realize the middle of the country actually has W hotels, sidewalks, locations, electricity and working toilets and waiters are actually pleasant to you whether you spend $7 or $700.

As far as Wall Street.  Does anyone really believe Wall Street can't be handled by a server and a laptop.  Same with Advertising.  I work with agencies in NY and never see the main players until the day of the shoot.  It's all done from the computer.

I'm lucky, I've lived a lot of places and worked about everywhere and if I've learned anything it's to get the "local" mindset out of your head.  Even NY or LA develop local minds where everything starts to look the same.  The very best way to produce is bring in the best from every market.

My crew last week came from Orange Country, West Hollywood, Ft. Worth, Dallas, New York and Miami.  

Nothing suffered, everything was shot on time without horrid stress, or $15 a day sand bag rentals.

I still have our NY space, but as I'm getting over Zipcodeitius I spend as little time there as possible.

When I bought this building in Dallas, everyone said I was nuts,  as the economy was roaring at full tilt and but I did my research for a year, found that Dallas had 50 major building projects to revitalize the city center, the 4th largest metro area in the U.S.  and had the highest per capita discretionary spending in the U.S.      In other words, people were not eaten by the taxman and landlord.  We were in Dallas for 2 hours when we walked into this building, I asked the price . . . heard the price and my wife said "Buy It".  

I've had a blast, go to NY when I want, actually go anywhere I want when I want and the only thing I'm missing is sitting in traffic for hours . . . oh yea and a beach, though believe it or not, Dallas is building a beach.

JRR
Logged

brentward

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 37
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #838 on: May 21, 2009, 01:11:20 pm »

Here's one from a couple of weeks ago.

Shot with the 5D II. I also am in favor of have more of a professional show your work than having it based strictly on format since I shoot both when needed.

Logged
___________________________________
brentwardphoto
splashpour.com

James R Russell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 992
    • http://www.russellrutherford.com/
Recent Professional Works
« Reply #839 on: May 21, 2009, 01:13:42 pm »

Quote from: TMARK
Nice.  New Orleans?

Thank you TMARK and Frank.

No not New Orleans, Dallas. Though 1/2 of New Orleans seems to have moved here.

 Rented the whole trolly for $250 and the rail line said "thank you".

The reflections were there, I only added the water drops.  Actually this image didn't require a lot of post work and it was shot medium format, by medium I mean a full frame 1ds3.

As far as this being a thread for medium format, I read the "rules" and this thread says Recent Professional Works.  As Andre says the rule for professionals is if you make more than 50% of your income from photography your a professional photographer, so since I've made 100% of my income from photography my adult life I guess I qualify.

Since I own two medium format backs, 4 medium format cameras that should also get me into the "club".   Since I chose not to primarily shoot with those two medium format backs and 4 medium format cameras maybe that gets me tossed out of the "club".

But what is "medium format"?   I mean a lot of digital cameras are smaller than 35mm, only one medium format back is almost full frame 645, so what qualifies, the box that holds it together, the lens, or maybe the fact that batteries only last 1 hour?

Maybe that's the next forum heading.  Shot with a camera that was designed in 1994 and requires 12 batteries per day.  

JRR

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 214   Go Up