so your answer then is yes, the bed does intrude into the frame and the camera must be turned 90deg to avoid this.
i use rear rise in interiors maybe 30-40% of the time.
this camera won't work for me if i have to turn the camera to use it with wide lenses.
i've never questioned that it is possible to shift suing the accsy linhof back.
my question is how much shift is possible compared to the sinar (whose back is integral to the camera). either we are having a language problem or i am not explaining myself well.
can someone else explain why putting a sliding back on the linhof techno is not the same as having a camera with rear shift capabilities please?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=223629\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
the answer is: I don`t know exactly how many mm you can shift down...
the 23mm doesn`t exist yet, so it is difficult...
and with the sliding back I think there is a language problem.
I would prefer spanish or German, my english is not really good...
If you are working in interiors I can recommand the Sinar. Focussing on groundglass is difficult and 20mm downshift will be enough.
I made two jobs with the Sinar and I was very happy.
The sliding back is necessary(i.m.O), so I think to compare the two cameras you must have the sliding back on the linhof.