Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Nikon CoolScan 9000 Wet or Dry scan?  (Read 3768 times)

hassiman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 156
Nikon CoolScan 9000 Wet or Dry scan?
« on: March 22, 2008, 11:32:16 am »

Just wondering what folks think of wet VS dry scanning?  Is wet worth the extra $$ and time?
Logged

Czornyj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1950
    • zarzadzaniebarwa.pl
Nikon CoolScan 9000 Wet or Dry scan?
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2008, 11:49:43 am »

Quote
Just wondering what folks think of wet VS dry scanning?  Is wet worth the extra $$ and time?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=183498\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I don't know about wet scanning, but I think that standard 120 frame is useless - the film bends and scans become partially unsharp. I bought EH-869G (frame with anti-newton rings glass) and that solved all my problems, and it's even faster to mount the film inside.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2008, 11:51:05 am by Czornyj »
Logged
Marcin Kałuża | [URL=http://zarzadzaniebarwa

Kumar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 754
    • http://www.bskumarphotography.com
Nikon CoolScan 9000 Wet or Dry scan?
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2008, 12:09:39 am »

Ernst Dinkla is the expert on wet scanning. He originated the idea of mounting film on the underside of the glass carrier. If he doesn't chime in, ask him.

Cheers,
Kumar
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up