Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: NR in camera or in post processing?  (Read 2658 times)

duraace

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 218
NR in camera or in post processing?
« on: March 04, 2008, 02:58:22 pm »

I'm using a Nikon D300 and shooting raw.  The defaults for long exposure NR and high ISO NR were set to OFF by default.  Except for shooting delays, is there a quality advantage to doing in camera NR prior to post processing or should these settings be left OFF if planning to do post processing?

My apologies if this was answered previously, but the search turned up too many posts that didn't answer the question.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2008, 02:59:02 pm by duraace »
Logged

NikoJorj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1082
    • http://nikojorj.free.fr/
NR in camera or in post processing?
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2008, 10:15:50 am »

Quote
I'm using a Nikon D300 and shooting raw.  The defaults for long exposure NR and high ISO NR were set to OFF by default.  Except for shooting delays, is there a quality advantage to doing in camera NR prior to post processing or should these settings be left OFF if planning to do post processing?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=179106\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Sorry for my canon-oriented answer - I don't know the D300 but here are my 2c's anyway...

These 2 things may not be the same : if "long exposure NR" means the camera taking a black frame of same duration and substract it if from the picture, it deals with mainly dead and hot pixels, and may be seen as hardware-related NR - something that's hard to do in PP.
Do it if you can afford it time- and battery-wise (and if I'm not mistaken in what it is ;o).

Otoh, I understand "high ISO NR" as a more conventional NR, more or less averaging adjacent values.
This may be better made in a powerful computer than in your camera.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2008, 10:16:31 am by NikoJorj »
Logged
Nicolas from Grenoble
A small gallery

Panopeeper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1805
NR in camera or in post processing?
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2008, 06:09:38 pm »

The in-camera noise reduction does not affect the raw data with the D300. Actually, the only camera I know of, which carries out noise reduction on the raw data is the Sony A700.
Logged
Gabor

Er1kksen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 154
NR in camera or in post processing?
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2008, 09:05:21 pm »

Which means that if you want to shoot RAW you have to go hunting hot pixels in PP instead of just using dark-exposure NR to get rid of them?

...


Kind of inconvenient.
Logged

duraace

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 218
NR in camera or in post processing?
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2008, 08:15:39 pm »

Quote
Which means that if you want to shoot RAW you have to go hunting hot pixels in PP instead of just using dark-exposure NR to get rid of them?

...
Kind of inconvenient.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=179442\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


My understanding is that dark or long-exposure NR *is* applied to RAW, but not high ISO, which is only applied to jpeg's in post.
Logged

RobertJ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 706
NR in camera or in post processing?
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2008, 07:24:36 pm »

In-camera for long exposures.
Software/post processing for everything else.  Capture as much detail as you can, and deal with noise (mostly color noise, luminance noise doesn't bother me much, as it's just mostly "grain") in post.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up