Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Wimberley Tripod Head, no roll axis?  (Read 3192 times)

paulbk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 528
Wimberley Tripod Head, no roll axis?
« on: May 17, 2007, 07:15:10 am »

I am considering the Wimberley Tripod Head II for use with Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM. The Canon 400 weighs about 12 pounds. From the photo, it appears the Wimberley has pan and pitch axis, but no roll axis (tilt left/right).
Is this true? That means must use the lens collar to roll, or the tripod must be ‘near level’ with the horizon.
Anyone find this to be a problem?

« Last Edit: May 17, 2007, 07:22:27 am by paulbk »
Logged
paul b. kramarchyk
Barkhamsted, Connecti

boku

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1493
    • http://www.bobkulonphoto.com
Wimberley Tripod Head, no roll axis?
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2007, 08:37:15 am »

I use the Gitzo leveling post on my 1325. That takes care of the problem with minimum hassle.
Logged
Bob Kulon

Oh, one more thing...[b

matt4626

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 187
Wimberley Tripod Head, no roll axis?
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2007, 04:25:55 pm »

No problem.
Logged

paulbk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 528
Wimberley Tripod Head, no roll axis?
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2007, 05:40:07 pm »

Thanks all..!
Logged
paul b. kramarchyk
Barkhamsted, Connecti

pathfinder

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 54
    • http://www.pathfinder.smugmug.com
Wimberley Tripod Head, no roll axis?
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2007, 07:51:49 pm »

Quote
I use the Gitzo leveling post on my 1325. That takes care of the problem with minimum hassle.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=118164\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Me too.

Using the Wimberly head without it could be rather annoying too. The Leveling post is one of those things I would not want to do without.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up