I have the Samsung 193P (not the inferior "Plus" version), with an NVIDIA 7900GT, and use an EyeOne Display 2. (I too was a fool to purchase a monitor without any buttons for an OSD, I've regretted it ever since I bought the thing. Unfortunately, I was swayed by all of the excellent reviews of it's image quality. I'm now on the quest for a 19" S-IPS display.) [a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=102171\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I wish I was more aware of color management when I got my 173p. I will replace it as soon as the finances allow. Probably should get a head start on that by researching the S-IPS vs. S-PVA debate. =)
Well, I used the Eye-One to calibrate my monitor tonight....finally! From the best that I can tell the calibration was successful. Now, I don't know what that means for a monitor like this, but I'll send out images tomorrow for printing and when they come back hopefully I'll see a close resemblance between the monitor and the prints.
During the calibration, I bypassed the RGB and Contrast adjustments. I manually adjusted the luminance here using the Samsung Magic Tune software, as you guys instructed me to do...going back and forth between Magic Tune and Eye-One's Match until I was as close as possible to the 120 target that I specified at the start of the calibration. I got it set at 120.7 during this adjustment.
The ambient light measurement option confused me a little. I bypassed that step. I calibrated the monitor in a dark room so no outside light sources could interfere. I set the targets up front just as you guys said to; 2.2 Gamma, 6500K White Point, Luminance at 120.
The results at the end, according to Match, were good. The White Point target of 6500K was met ... The 2.2 Gamma target was matched... and the Luminance ended up being 121 vs. the 120 target. However, the lines on the graph showing the results were a little bent, and they all didn't come together in the upper right corner of the graph..is that an issue at all?
The only thing that has me guessing whether the calibration is good or not are my first impressions of some images I looked at in PS post-calibration. Compared to the sRGB images displayed in IE explorer (I had my monitor profile set to sRGB when I originally worked the photos...so PS and IE appeard the same), the same images in PS appeared to have a slight hint of magenta....noticeable mostly in clouds and over skin tones. It's very slight. I'm just wondering if that is a result of the images being worked in PS prior to the Eye-One calibration, now needing to be reworked post-calibration? Or, is the calibration off?
I guess only the prints will tell....
Again, I can't thank you guys enough. I put this question out in numerous forums and LL is the only forum where a real solution was offered. I'm here to stay.