In the spirit of goodwill in these trying times, cut David some slack . He did state he's a software developer, you guys are asking mostly hardware related stuff. We can always fast-forward through the marketing speak, but we may get some other useful info too.
Also I tend to agree with him about the target audience not being that interested in raw data. I think a lot of people don't want to get to that level of sophistication, me included. I want to get a nice profile as painlessly as possible, and quite frankly I found the software well designed in this aspect. Remember, he doesn't define the product, the marketing people do. It's mostly out of his hands. Plus every additional level of functionality can add significantly to the development, testing and production costs, and Colorvision like most corporations is out there to make money for the stockholders, although hopefully providing a useful product to ensure this.
Also remember he's here as a representative of his company, which places constraints on what he says and how, and the fact he'd like to keep his job. Frankly I admired his courage for even participating in the discussion, especially after seeing the shall we say tough audience he's facing .
Just another perspective ...
Having said that, I'm having a hard time getting a proper profile using PFP 2.0 for my iPF5000 through the standard Windows driver (not through Photoshop) and maybe he can help me out . I guess I should start another appropriately named thread ...