Matte and canvas fine art has, as far as I know been a sector *owned* by Epson over the last few years - and Epson have regularly improved their product. Epson also has been supplying decent if not stellar media, I believe, and third party vendors supply decent canned profiles for Epson printers with their media.
In other words, Epson have a good product which they keep updating and improving, while Canon and HP are playing catchup. So anyone who prints matte and wants to use a printer other than Epson should know exactly why they are doing so. As an example a need for frequent painless change of media would give HP's self-profiling solution a big advantage. Price or a service contract via a dealer, could also be an argument - all of the big three make usable hardware, it just has different areas of application.
As a sidenote, ther are other industrial solvent-based solutions with much wider gamuts available from other vendors (eg. Mimaki) which produce spectacular prints, but these should not be used in indoors office environments.
Edmund
Edmund, could you elaborate more on your gut feelings? Perhaps some reasoning behind the selections. What are your feelings if you print mainly matte and canvas?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=95959\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]