Calibration issue with NEC PA301W. Prints too dark...

[TechTalk]

Did you examine the metadata (for Copyright)?

No, I didn't. I had already seen enough of this ham-handedly woven veil and pretext.

[Slobodan Blagojevic]

.

[TechTalk]

Might I suggest the extra-large size popcorn sir? It may or may not be entertaining, but the show will be long.

[TechTalk]

...A moderator...would also have noted your misogynistic trolling of me and brought you to heel.

A moderator could ban me or anyone. This isn't my website or forum and I'm only here as long as the owner finds that acceptable.

But... bring me to heel? Really?

I think you may misunderstand the nature of forum moderation. There is no command to heel available to a forum moderator, no matter how much you may wish there were. I'm sorry to inform you that you'll need to reserve those commands for those with whom you have a more direct personal relationship.

[digitaldog]

He would also have noted your misogynistic trolling of me and brought you to heel.

Wow, that's a pretty loaded accusation mostly based on a lot of assumptions.

What is the meaning of being misogynistic?
hatred of or prejudice against women
: feeling, showing, or characterized by hatred of or prejudice against women : of, relating to, or being a misogynist misogynistic attitude/behaviors a song with misogynistic lyrics As you might imagine, the group's ethos is extremely misogynistic and accepting of violent threats against women.—

It just shows what a teen boy can accomplish in his darkened bedroom if he stops watching pornography for a while and puts his hands to more constructive use.

Would the moderator also have noted your misandry trolling of TechTalk? 
Misandry (/mɪˈsændri/) is the hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against men.[1][2] It is the asymmetrical[3][4] counterpart of misogyny.

Do either those suffering Misandry and misogynistic viewpoints know anything above display calibration issues and have further recommendations for the OP?

[TechTalk]

...you found St Pölten... I was there for the half Ironman...

It appears that our former moderator, whom you've suggested we should beg to return, was there for that event as well and photographed it. Perhaps he would share some of his pictures with you. Who knows? You may be in some of them.

Now, wouldn't that be a coincidence? Ain't life funny sometimes?

[TechTalk]

I don't particularly care who does the moderation -

Oh, no one would suspect a personal agenda at play. How dare anyone!

the previous man seems, looking back at his interventions, to have been doing a good job...

Of course, I see. Just a casual evaluation reflecting back on that golden period of moderation which ended just a few days before you decided to register here.

How fortunate we are that you joined as soon as he left, to point out our flawed behavior and the benefit derived from his presence which we now so sadly lack.

[TechTalk]

Tech, I'm impressed... Anyway, you have me bang to rights. I'm not really sf at all. I'm one of the Illuminati, a shape-shifting lizard like the Queen of England. You have outed me. Well done.

I never would have suspected that. I do suspect, however, that the time may be ripe to consider a change in your prescription.

[TechTalk]

...misogynistic trolling of me...

Find something else to hide behind. No one here, myself included, knows who you are or what you are. That shield doesn't seem to fit you very well.

I've never bothered to check the gender of a fly buzzing around before waving it off or whacking it with a swatter. So, don't imagine that you're somehow special.

[digitaldog]

I've never bothered to check the gender of a fly buzzing around before waving it off or whacking it with a swatter.

What kind of Samurai are you?

"Samurai And Fly" joke
Back in the time of the Samurai there was a powerful emperor who needed a new head Samurai so he sent out a declaration throughout the country that he was searching for one. A year passed and only 3 people showed up. The emperor asked the first Samurai to come in and demonstrate why he should be head Samurai. The first Samurai opened a match box and out pops a little fly. Whoosh goes his sword and the fly drops dead on the ground in 2 pieces. The emperor exclaimed, "That is very impressive!" The emperor then asked the second Samurai to come in and demonstrate. The second Samurai also opened a match box and out pops a fly. Whoosh whoosh goes his sword. The fly drops dead on the ground in 4 pieces. The emperor exclaimed, "That is really very impressive!" The emperor then had the third Samurai demonstrate why he should be the head Samurai. The third Samurai also opened a match box and out pops a fly. His flashing sword goes whoooooooossshhh whoooooooossshhh whoooooooossshhh whoooooooossshhh whoooooooossshhh. A gust of wind fills the room, but the fly is still alive and buzzing around. The emperor, obviously disappointed, asks, "After all of that, why is the fly not dead?" The third Samurai smiled, "fly flies, fly fu*k no more! 

[TechTalk]

You are a teenage troll, sitting in your little bedroom...

It just shows what a teen boy can accomplish in his darkened bedroom if he stops watching pornography for a while and puts his hands to more constructive use.

In all seriousness, this fixation you seem to have with teen boys in their bedrooms is something you should consider discussing with a professional.

[Frans Waterlander]

Wow, that's a pretty loaded accusation mostly based on a lot of assumptions.

Look who is talking!

[digitaldog]

Look who is talking!

Indeed, the carpet craper who can't manage to load a photograph he's taken for us to view.
In addition, a poster who hasn't a clue nor can post anything on this topic: Calibration issue with NEC PA301W.  Prints too dark...

[Frans Waterlander]

Indeed, the carpet craper who can't manage to load a photograph he's taken for us to view.
In addition, a poster who hasn't a clue nor can post anything on this topic: Calibration issue with NEC PA301W.  Prints too dark...

Assumption #1: I can't manage to load an image
Assumption #2: I have no clue nor can I post anything on this topic.
And you accuse others of making assumptions?

[digitaldog]

💩Assumption #1: I can't manage to load an image
💩Assumption #2: I have no clue nor can I post anything on this topic.
💩And you accuse others of making assumptions?

1&2, zero proof of concept. Zero. And you can't. You are simply incapable!

Best summed up again:

With tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of websites with forums on so many topics, how is it Frans has decided to come here, take a 💩dump on our carpet so often when it's clear he has zero talent or an ability to take a photograph? All while his audience nearly unanimously rejects virtually everything he posts?
I sometimes don't agree with Slobodan but there is no question (and proof of concept) he is a very good photographer.
I almost never agree with the fiction Alan posts on the topic of technology, but he's at least able to show us, he can take a picture.
With Frans, one has to wonder if anyone he encounters takes him seriously let alone respects him. Here and on PhotoNet (another photo website he frequently dumps his 💩 bowel movements), not the case. This distinguished fact is for eternity....

It would be such a stretch IF you could understand the fact that your readers here can't and never take you seriously.
This sums up your posting agenda and problems to a tee Frans: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-_Fav3iPTE0

[TechTalk]

Did you examine the metadata (for Copyright)?

I did look after you asked and for that particular image it just said "sf" under copyright. No surprise.

For some reason though, if you look at the IPTC data for the cloud image posted by "sf" here, it says "Creator Jeremy Roussak" and "Copyright Notice Jeremy Roussak". Jeremy Roussak is also the copyright and creator listed in this rose image posted by "sf".

Huh... I wonder how "sf" ended up posting photos here with copyrights for Jeremy Roussak embedded inside. I'm confused. What do you think?

* For those new here or just coming into the middle of this soap opera... Jeremy Roussak is the former moderator "sf" has suggested should be "begged to return". Jeremy ended his posts and time as moderator here a few days before "sf" registered and began posting comments about how horrible the forum had become without his moderation while also trying to stir up old animosities and resentments or create new ones. There... that should be enough to bring you up to speed.

Perhaps all "sf" can say about it is...

Wow! Well caught.

S

[digitaldog]

I did look after you asked and for that particular image it just said "sf" under copyright. No surprise.

The only surprise is someone popping just that into the metadata, alone as if that had any usefulness being there. I found it pretty funny.

For some reason though, if you look at the IPTC data for the cloud image posted by "sf" here, it says "Creator Jeremy Roussak" and "Copyright Notice Jeremy Roussak".

Indeed, sloppy.

Huh... I wonder how "sf" ended up posting photos here with copyrights for Jeremy Roussak embedded inside. I'm confused. What do you think?

Maybe one of us should ping Jeremy and let him know some 'woman' stole his photoS?

[TechTalk]

Now that the credits are rolling and the show is over, perhaps Slobodan will share his popcorn with us—if there's any left. I admit that I stole some when he wasn't looking. That's what happens when you no longer have a moderator around to bring "you to heel" and keep people honest.

I defy you to...

Mom always said to be careful what you wish for and not to dare anyone to do anything. Now, there was a wise gal!

[TechTalk]

You have to admit that the sf/Jeremy soap opera is currently more entertaining and unpredictable than a rerun of another Andrew/Frans WrestleMania exhibition match.

[digitaldog]

You have to admit that the sf/Jeremy soap opera is currently more entertaining and unpredictable than a rerun of another Andrew/Frans WrestleMania exhibition match.

I do indeed.